User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation how to make a racket more head heavy???

    hi guys i want to make my nano 900 power more head heavy....
    what kind of tape should i use?? athletic tape,lead tape or anything else?
    could you also explain to me how to apply it without blocking the grommets.
    pics or diagrams are most welcome.
    if there is a thread about it plz post the link.

    thanks

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    65
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i'll be offline for a few days so feel free to post any relevant material.
    thanks.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Ireland.
    Posts
    1,236
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Last edited by Destricto_Ense; 03-19-2010 at 07:56 AM.

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Great links...very informative...

    one thing i was wondering, that i couldn't find more info from those links, and sorry for the hijacking, but how does the placement of the tapes on the racket head affect the head heaviness or swing speed/feel? LD placed (very hardcore) around half of the whole rackethead, while others suggest either 11 and 1, or 9 and 3, and some guy put just one tape at 12 o'clock. Length varies.

    So how does those placements differ?

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @gapperon: Why would you want to make a badminton more head heavy? The key of the game is to be agile and explosive.. Having a head heavy Badminton racquet will make it sluggish (imo)

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    vincent...i am not really looking to make it super headheavy...i am using the a900t now and it's just a little headheavy but super agile.

    anyway i am also just curious of the different modifications with the tape that increases the headheaviness and just wonder how do they differ!

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    oh okay, in tennis lead added @ 3+9 oclock widens the "sweetspot" of the racquet
    @ 12 it sifts the spot up and @ the Handle it shifts it down, its a quick generalization but hey lol.

    I tried adding lead to my Ti5 cuz i found it too light compared to my tennis racquet but after a while i felt like making some changes so i took it off and it felt way better, cuz of the increased racquet Head speed.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    thanx for the quick generalization, but i think it is a really quick one! hahaha now i have more questions than i asked for!

    how does 3+9 "widen" the sweetspot? in terms of headheaviness, any lead sticking to the head of the racket will make it so, whereas sticking it to the handle will decrease it. but....

    how does the overall headheaviness feels comparing between 3+9, 12, and 11+1? does 3+9 gives you more 'lateral' swing motion, and 12 gives you more downward swingthrough motion, or 11+1 is the mix of the two???? *whao, that sounds really ridiculous but it's as intelligent guess as an ignorant!"*

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    112
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i know i gotta try it to learn first hand for myself, but any sneak peaks into the "what" and the "why" would be great for a new week!

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    though its on customizing tennis racquets its pretty useful info. http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/LC/customize.html

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    dunno the science behind it though

  12. #12
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,470
    Mentioned
    114 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gapperonduty View Post
    how does 3+9 "widen" the sweetspot? in terms of headheaviness, any lead sticking to the head of the racket will make it so, whereas sticking it to the handle will decrease it. but....

    how does the overall headheaviness feels comparing between 3+9, 12, and 11+1? does 3+9 gives you more 'lateral' swing motion, and 12 gives you more downward swingthrough motion, or 11+1 is the mix of the two???? *whao, that sounds really ridiculous but it's as intelligent guess as an ignorant!"*
    In theory, having the added weight (ie. light thin tape) more evenly distributed along the top of the frame (a la Lin Dan) would be better than at one or two points (eg. lead weight), in terms of off centre or off axis hits.

  13. #13
    Regular Member Sketchy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    The Westcountry
    Posts
    707
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Weight at the top of the frame gives the most extra power (longest lever and all that).
    Weight at the sides gives the best stability on off-centre hits.
    Adding weight to handle is pointless - it makes the balance more head-light, but the racket won't swing any faster because the mass of the frame has not changed.

    Prince add Tungsten (very dense) at the 2 and 10 o'clock positions on their "Triple Threat" rackets, in an effort to increase both power and stability.

  14. #14
    Regular Member Thom_bad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Saskatoon, Canada
    Posts
    2,517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Pehaps try to put your grip as YoRi do, ending it at the middle of the shaft

  15. #15
    Regular Member george@chongwei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    29,946
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Anyone know how to apply it on a racket?

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur
    Posts
    160
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol george =p I thought you pro!

    Dont want to teach you now hahahah

  17. #17
    Regular Member george@chongwei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    MIA
    Posts
    29,946
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You know how to do it, calvin?

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 2
    : 07-08-2011, 07:05 PM
  2. Head heavy very stiff Oval Head racket ???
    By pussiii999 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 17
    : 12-19-2008, 05:19 AM
  3. How would you make a racket head heavy?
    By Ramster in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 11
    : 11-12-2007, 09:06 AM
  4. how to make my racket little more head heavy.
    By Burger_King in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 28
    : 10-11-2007, 04:31 AM
  5. How to make your racket more head heavy without Destroying it
    By Jason in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 32
    : 12-01-2004, 04:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •