Aeroblade ISO FX Vs Aeroblade FX:

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by mr_flibbles, Mar 28, 2010.

  1. mr_flibbles

    mr_flibbles Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    bum
    Location:
    everywhere
    I have seen both of these rackets on the web and they seem almost identical but the FX version has a classic shape head and the iso has an isometric shape. But the classic head version costs £6 more with the only other difference being the color. Was wondering if anyone could shed some light on why the classic shape would be more expensive? ty.
     
  2. Sketchy

    Sketchy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    Ski Tech
    Location:
    The Westcountry
    The iso and oval versions would normally both cost the same.
    However, you mention that they're different colors...

    The newer generation of Aeroblade FX (both iso and oval versions) are yellow and white.
    The older generation (again, both iso and oval versions) were red and white.

    As far as I know, the difference is purely cosmetic, so I would advise you to go with the iso version, since it's cheaper and isometric frames play better.
     
  3. mr_flibbles

    mr_flibbles Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    37
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    bum
    Location:
    everywhere
    alright thanks, was just wondering whether the classic design was a different racket but if the only difference is the iso shaped frame practically the iso one should be better.
     

Share This Page