I have seen both of these rackets on the web and they seem almost identical but the FX version has a classic shape head and the iso has an isometric shape. But the classic head version costs £6 more with the only other difference being the color. Was wondering if anyone could shed some light on why the classic shape would be more expensive? ty.
The iso and oval versions would normally both cost the same. However, you mention that they're different colors... The newer generation of Aeroblade FX (both iso and oval versions) are yellow and white. The older generation (again, both iso and oval versions) were red and white. As far as I know, the difference is purely cosmetic, so I would advise you to go with the iso version, since it's cheaper and isometric frames play better.
alright thanks, was just wondering whether the classic design was a different racket but if the only difference is the iso shaped frame practically the iso one should be better.