Results 35 to 51 of 85
Thread: Net blocking / distraction
05-17-2012, 07:08 PM #35
Our group started playing badminton 1-2 years ago, so we are reading this topic from the beginners stand point. Similar situations happen within our group quite often and I am still confused after reading 2 pages of posts. Please help to clarify this one more time and provide exact rule if possible:
I go close to the net to return a shuttle back to my opponents court about 4 feet from the net. Therefore, my opponents' racket will not follow through and cross the net. If I keep my head under the net and only raise the racket to anticipate to block my opponent's shot, is this legal since I am not obstructing my opponent's stroke?
I am also interested to know any answers to pcll99's question: " is there an official (ie BWF's) explanation as to what is or is not an obstruction?" Thanks.
05-17-2012, 09:09 PM #36
05-17-2012, 10:15 PM #37
Ok so I will try to make this as clear as possible, the following is the only line in the rulebook about it, however it was on my umpire exam about certain situations including this one.
13.4.2 invades an opponent’s court over the net with racket or person except that the striker may follow the shuttle over the net with the racket in the course of a stroke after the initial point of contact with the shuttle is on the striker’s side of the net;
13.4.4 obstructs an opponent, i.e. prevents an opponent from making a legal stroke where the shuttle is followed over the net;
So, if the shuttle is above the net and on your side, you are allowed to reach over the net as long as you hit the shuttle and follow through (but you cannot touch the net, only go over!)
If the shuttle is BELOW the net, then your opponent can have their racket by the net as long as they are not reaching over. If the shuttle is below the net, there is NO way you can reach over the net to follow through on your shot. Therefore, in that instance, they can have their racket by the net to wait for a kill.
05-18-2012, 04:49 AM #38
There's nothing in the rules that says it makes a difference whether the shuttle is above or below net height.
amleto liked this post
05-18-2012, 05:49 AM #39
my understanding is this. If you hold your racket up at (or over) the net before your opponent hits the birdie, then it's an obstruction.
am i right?
05-18-2012, 06:06 AM #40
Gee everyone is complicating this. If you are trying to block a shot, you can, just don't put your racket OVER the net. The only time you can put your racket over the net is if you have followed through AFTER hitting the bird on YOUR side of the net. Yes it might distract the player seeing a racket hovering parallel to the net above him, but that is completely legal, just clear it rather than drop shot when his racket already at net height ready for the kill. The END.
05-18-2012, 07:44 AM #41
05-18-2012, 01:35 PM #42
I guess I should make this as simple as possible for everyone.
If YOU have a chance to reach over the net on a legal shot, your opponent CANNOT hold their racket at/near the net (near enough where a collision could occur, judgemental; )
In every other instance, your opponent can have the racket at the net as long as they don't touch the net or reach over.
Which is what exactly 13.4.4 states.
There's really nothing else to it.
ToniZ liked this post
05-20-2012, 01:29 PM #43
Thanks for everyone's contribution. I think CantSmashThis makes this quite easy to follow. On a different note, post#22 said " ... you always have to make a hitting action. That would mean that simply blocking the net is a fault, as you make no hitting action. ... " I also heard similar comments from 2 different sources. Is there any rule to support this? Thanks.
05-22-2012, 06:46 AM #44
05-22-2012, 06:48 AM #45
05-22-2012, 09:56 PM #46
I think the point about making a hitting action as opposed to holding your racket up to block a shot without a hitting action is merely to distinguish how umpires see the intent, not necessarily any specific rule to differentiate the two.
If you make a hitting action, that usually means that you are not trying to interfere with the person's kill attempt (though it's debatable) so as long as your racket is not blocking the opponent's swing to begin with.
Making no hitting action is more likely to have the umpire interpret your intent to block the swing of your opponent.
That's at least how I see it, it's more of the non-literal parts of the rule from what I can see.
05-23-2012, 06:04 PM #47
Tactim, I think it is deeper seeded than that.
I've had more than one person tell me that it's a fault not to 'play a shot' (ie you are not allowed to just hold your racket out). They are absolutely wrong, but they don't know it.
It's a ridiculous would-be rule because it would outlaw any net shots where you do a double-bluff show (e.g. show a straight net really early, and then just keep your racket there and actually play a straight net).
06-01-2012, 02:37 PM #48
The hitting action makes it a bit more confusing...
But it is not considered an obstruction if, in the opinion of the umpire, you are attempting a return shot of the net kill. As in you aren't just leaving your racket at the net, but you are swinging your racket to try to return it. However, even if you end up returning the shuttle but clash rackets with your opponent at the same time, your opponent gets the point because you did not allow him to fully follow through into his shot.
Very confusing, I know. A lot of grayness to this unfortunately.
06-01-2012, 03:18 PM #49
"But it is not considered an obstruction if, in the opinion of the umpire, you are attempting a return shot of the net kill"
That is not accurate.
No where in the rules does intention affect whether or not obstruction happens. And no where in the rules is a clash of rackets a requirement for obstruction.
In short, whether you hold your racket still, or make a short stroke, it makes no difference. It just matters whether you obstruct or not.
06-01-2012, 05:46 PM #50
There is a difference between holding your racket waiting at the net, and being near the net but attempting a swing. If you are holding your racket close to the net, it is a fault regardless. If you are attempting a swing near the net, and make it over without rackets clashing or obstructing, then it is a legal shot.
It's hard to understand but there is a difference. Hence why other members will point out that they have heard "you must attempt a hitting action", which Ian says himself.
06-01-2012, 10:11 PM #51
in this scenario, you will normally loose the point due to desparation. why stress and bother. Just hope for mistakes.
By jwu42 in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / OfficiatingReplies: 39: 09-22-2011, 08:51 PM
By DeadlyDuck in forum Techniques / TrainingReplies: 7: 03-30-2009, 04:05 AM
By bad_fanatic in forum Rules / Tournament Regulation / OfficiatingReplies: 16: 12-04-2007, 12:11 AM
By chorlaw in forum Singapore Open 2007 / Indonesia Open 2007Replies: 44: 05-10-2007, 12:32 AM
By neilpais in forum General ForumReplies: 3: 05-08-2002, 10:42 PM