will LCW be world champ this year?

[pBmMalaysia]

ctjcad, are you trying to teach us here in bc

to use numbers when we express our opinion

and if we don't want we can still use ''a lot'' or ''minimal''

either way is there any difference?

[chris-ccc]

ctjcad, are you trying to teach us here in bc

to use numbers when we express our opinion

and if we don't want we can still use ''a lot'' or ''minimal''

either way is there any difference?

.
What is the difference?

Perhaps;
* Less than 50% ... = not sure
* 50%................... = half sure
* More than 50% .. = more sure

.

[jug8man]

who knows? anyone's guess is as good as any

[AlanY]

the truth of the matter is, if LD is going to Paris this Aug the answer to OP's question is NO.

[pBmMalaysia]

and just who is this op?

[undeadshot]

the truth of the matter is, if LD is going to Paris this Aug the answer to OP's question is NO.

I understand that you make yourself useful in this forum by contributing statistics about SS winners and all, but if you are here to only say this, don't come in this sub-forum. Looks like you forgot the tournament this year where your location is.

And no, this is nothing related to freedom of speech or whatever. It is just that we just have too much of these comments lately, and it doesn't contribute anything besides running down every player except LD.

[eaglehelang]

and just who is this op?

Shortform for Original Poster, the fellow who started the thread with the question

..please read carefully what i wrote..
Btw, i feel TXH's factor is less than 50% to LD's success (abt 30-35%, max). Others might think otherwise (at abt 50% or even more)...how abt you? how much percentage would you factor TXH in LD's success??..

Haha, since we're into numbers, more than yours for sure. 50% to 55%, in terms of LD winning major titles. If 'normal' tournaments, it's ok, the usual coach will do.
Now I recall......you dont consider the 'coach' factor as much as I do, that's what I understood from your PM.

[eaglehelang]

.

Perhaps;
* Less than 50% ... = not sure
* 50%................... = half sure
* More than 50% .. = more sure

.

Or
0 to 14 % = will NOT win lah
15 to 20% - low chance
21 to 40% - have so so chance to win
41 to 50% - ok chance to half half
51 to 70% - quite sure
70% and above- sure win one lah

[pBmMalaysia]

I understand that you make yourself useful in this forum by contributing statistics about SS winners and all, but if you are here to only say this, don't come in this sub-forum. Looks like you forgot the tournament this year where your location is.

And no, this is nothing related to freedom of speech or whatever. It is just that we just have too much of these comments lately, and it doesn't contribute anything besides running down every player except LD.

oh gosh!

you put the words into my mouth

[undeadshot]

oh gosh!

you put the words into my mouth

Hehe, I think it was a bit too much though. I was just not very happy to see the same comments again and again, but nevermind, it will not affect me in my day-to-day lives.

[ctjcad]

...Haha, since we're into numbers, more than yours for sure. 50% to 55%, in terms of LD winning major titles. If 'normal' tournaments, it's ok, the usual coach will do.
Now I recall......you dont consider the 'coach' factor as much as I do, that's what I understood from your PM.

off topic:
i don't know for sure when did Tang Xinhu start sitting behind LinDan to coach his matches. But as far as i recall, LD most likely won the 2004 AE title, the 2006 AE title, the 2006 WC title, the 2007 WC, the 2009 AE title (vs. LCW in the Final, i may add, and if i recall, it was Xia Xuanze sitting there) without having Tang Xinhu sitting behind him..Can one of the LD fans confirm for me, if they've watched the Finals of those matches??..

[Thom_bad]

I have seen Xuanze Xia a few times, but cannot remember when..

[chris-ccc]

0 to 14 % = will NOT win lah
15 to 20% - low chance
21 to 40% - have so so chance to win
41 to 50% - ok chance to half half
51 to 70% - quite sure
70% and above- sure win one lah

.
You are confident to have 70% and above, for sure win one lah?

For me, I need 99.99% for a sure win one lah.
.

[eaglehelang]

.
You are confident to have 70% and above, for sure win one lah?

For me, I need 99.99% for a sure win one lah.
.

I cant think of any description for 71 to 90%
. 'Sure win one lah' should be 91% and above

[majyun]

I cant think of any description for 71 to 90%. Sure win should be 90% and above

easy.
71%-90% 'almost' sure win.
Just a suggestion

[AlanY]

the truth of the matter is, if LD is going to Paris this Aug the answer to OP's question is NO.

and just who is this op?

OP, the original poster as the one who asked the question.

I understand that you make yourself useful in this forum by contributing statistics about SS winners and all, but if you are here to only say this, don't come in this sub-forum. Looks like you forgot the tournament this year where your location is.

And no, this is nothing related to freedom of speech or whatever. It is just that we just have too much of these comments lately, and it doesn't contribute anything besides running down every player except LD.

this is my prediction and i'll stick to it, only a few weeks to find out.

[undeadshot]

OP, the original poster as the one who asked the question.



this is my prediction and i'll stick to it, only a few weeks to find out.

Is this your prediction or the 'truth of the matter'?