User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    Posts
    113
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default New Yonex Racket chart!~

    Name:  P009_01.jpg
Views: 5480
Size:  97.8 KB
    new chart!~

  2. #2
    Regular Member Blurry D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Singapore, Yishun
    Posts
    1,804
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hmm what are the quantum like.. attacking , defense? head heavy head light?

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    Posts
    113
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    top is head heavy and bottom is head light (reading off from the japanese which know kinda how to read)
    im guessing the one on the left is HOLD and the right one is REPULSION as seen on other charts =O

  4. #4
    Regular Member Thom_bad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    France (Paris)
    Posts
    2,516
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    NS 9900 more head heavy than arc7 ??

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    B.C. Canada
    Posts
    113
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No idea man i got this from shuttle house Yonex Fall catalogue ;P

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Tokyo / Hong Kong
    Posts
    84
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    From Yonex JP :
    Name:  matrix.jpg
Views: 5805
Size:  202.5 KB
    Top: Head Heavy
    Left: Hold
    Right: Repulsion
    Bottom: Head Light

    Do anyone have a idea where should I place the Mizuno TC700 in this chart?
    I think it should be some where between at900t and ns9900.
    Last edited by lhkjacky; 10-01-2010 at 05:57 AM.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Funny that they can't even get their own racket-series-names right :-D

    ARORTEC... a new amazing series from YY

    /Twobeer
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    256
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wow, can't believe all these years, aerotus is still up there in the racket chart!

  9. #9
    Regular Member jhirata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand, New Z
    Posts
    2,487
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by twobeer View Post
    Funny that they can't even get their own racket-series-names right :-D

    ARORTEC... a new amazing series from YY

    /Twobeer
    What.. Comparing my 2U 1st Gen TC700 to my 2nd gen 3U AT700, the TC700 is head-heavier (320mm), and the "kick-point" feature makes it feel like a "hold" racquet to me. Top left.
    Or maybe it's just mine ? lol

  10. #10
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,568
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Haha I had it like this but I only have an AT700 and 8DX here as reference points here as far as head heaviness is concerned. Probably I would put it more on line with the AT900's on second thought but since Kwun recently measured his Arc10 @ 300mm (assume unstrung given the 86.x gram) ...

    There is a whole sticky reserved for this topic fiy: http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...election-chart

    Last edited by demolidor; 10-02-2010 at 06:35 AM.

  11. #11
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,568
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    (My AT700 I is 300mm unstrung, factory grip and TC700 ~293mm unstrung, factory grip)

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    3,989
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    (My AT700 I is 300mm unstrung, factory grip and TC700 ~293mm unstrung, factory grip)
    I did place it slightly below AT700 in headheavyness in the first place :-)

    You probably have the 2U that usually has a bit less head heavy BP than the 3U My 3Us are 298-310.. btw the bp of VT70 is speced at abt. 290mm .. so it shouldnt really be below that :-)

    also btw, AT900T is speced ab.t 285-295mm so putting the tc700 below that in balance would be wrong imhop..

    /Twobeer
    Last edited by twobeer; 10-02-2010 at 07:24 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Yonex selection chart
    By Winex West Can in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 335
    : 03-03-2014, 03:02 AM
  2. Yonex String Chart
    By calfunz in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 137
    : 12-17-2012, 01:50 PM
  3. Victor Racket chart - Need translation!
    By KinkySmasher in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 18
    : 10-08-2012, 09:31 AM
  4. Need Racket balance chart (2007 Yonex Japan ctlg.)
    By Dawnmoon in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 5
    : 03-02-2008, 09:02 PM
  5. yonex chart-NS9000
    By doris160260 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 2
    : 02-08-2006, 11:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •