User Tag List

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5
Results 69 to 72 of 72
  1. #69
    Moderator cobalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Arrakis
    Posts
    8,664
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AlanY View Post
    why do we need the advises or even listen to a lying cheater!
    There are many who swear by such people... I guess it all depends which side of the argument you're on, doesn't it?

  2. #70
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,175
    Mentioned
    96 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Lance's interview with Oprah:

    Wow, as I had expected, not only did he not show any remorse or contrition for his years of lies, cheating, bullying and suing those who told the truth, he also revealed how a deeply flawed athlete he is ... one without a moral compass and a complete disregard to the rules of sports.

    An arrogant, manipulative, sociopathic, egomaniacal pr*ck. He should have just stayed back in his cave instead of confirming his true character to the world. He was more embarrased and sorry at being caught doping than being sorry for doping.

  3. #71
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,175
    Mentioned
    96 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Still forever unrepentant...

    http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/2471413

    Lance Armstrong: 'Impossible' to win Tour de France without doping


    PORTO VECCHIO, Corsica (AP) - The dirty past of the Tour de France came back Friday to haunt the 100th edition of cycling's showcase race, with Lance Armstrong telling a newspaper he couldn't have won without doping.

    Armstrong's interview with Le Monde was surprising on many levels, not least because of his long-antagonistic relationship with the respected French daily that first reported in 1999 that corticosteroids were found in the American's urine as he was riding his way to the first of his seven Tour wins. In response, Armstrong had complained that he was being persecuted by "vulture journalism, desperate journalism."

    Now seemingly prepared to let bygones be bygones, Armstrong told Le Monde that he still considers himself the record-holder for Tour victories, even though all seven of his titles were stripped from him last year for doping. He also said his life has been ruined by the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency investigation that exposed as lies his years of denials that he and his teammates doped.

    The interview was the latest blast from cycling's doping-tainted recent history to rain on the Tour's 100th race. Previously, Armstrong's former rival on French roads, 1997 Tour winner Jan Ullrich, confessed to blood-doping for the first time with a Spanish doctor. French media also reported that a Senate investigation into the effectiveness of anti-doping controls pieced together evidence of drug use at the 1998 Tour by Laurent Jalabert, a former star of the race now turned broadcaster.

    Not surprising in Armstrong's interview was his claim that it was "impossible" to win the Tour without doping when he was racing. Armstrong already told U.S. television talk-show host Oprah Winfrey when he finally confessed this January that doping was just "part of the job" of being a pro-cyclist. The banned hormone erythropoietin, or EPO, wasn't detectable by cycling's doping controls until 2001 and so was widely abused because it prompts the body to produce oxygen-carrying blood cells, giving a big performance boost to endurance athletes.

    Armstrong was clearly talking about his own era, rather than the Tour today. Le Monde reported that he was responding to the question: "When you raced, was it possible to perform without doping?"

    "That depends on which races you wanted to win. The Tour de France? No. Impossible to win without doping. Because the Tour is a test of endurance where oxygen is decisive," Le Monde quoted Armstrong as saying. It published the interview in French.

    Some subsequent media reports about Le Monde's interview concluded that Armstrong was saying doping is still necessary now, rather than when he was winning the Tour from 1999-2005. That suggestion provoked dismay from current riders, race organizers and the sport's governing body, the International Cycling Union or UCI.

    "If he's saying things like he doesn't think that it's possible to win the Tour clean, then he should be quiet - because it is possible," said American rider Tejay van Garderen of the BMC team.

    UCI President Pat McQuaid called the timing of Armstrong's comments "very sad."

    "I can tell him categorically that he is wrong. His comments do absolutely nothing to help cycling," McQuaid said in a statement. "The culture within cycling has changed since the Armstrong era and it is now possible to race and win clean."

    "Riders and teams owners have been forthright in saying that it is possible to win clean - and I agree with them."

    Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  4. #72
    Regular Member Tadashi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    162
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Red queen, I say, red queen.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 143
    : 09-30-2010, 11:54 PM
  2. Is Bao chun lai cheating?? Chen Hong got red handed cheating!!!
    By eagle in forum Asian Games 2006 - Badminton
    Replies: 81
    : 09-06-2010, 01:00 AM
  3. Was Chen Jin cheating?
    By bogensaebel in forum World Championships 2010
    Replies: 430
    : 09-02-2010, 02:07 AM
  4. Year 2009: Lance Armstrong is back !!!
    By chris-ccc in forum Chit-Chat
    Replies: 64
    : 10-16-2009, 03:04 AM
  5. cheating...using the NSS
    By wing-omega5-0 in forum General Forum
    Replies: 16
    : 10-19-2006, 03:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •