IOC to decide future of mixed doubles

Discussion in 'General Forum' started by MoS, Feb 20, 2003.

  1. MoS

    MoS Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2002
    Messages:
    43
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    software
    Location:
    SFBay area,California,USA
    IOC to decide future of sports

    REUTERS[ THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 20, 2003 02:37:05 PM ]

    LAUSANNE: Events battling for their Olympic survival are bolstering their defences as officials prepare a radical shake-up of the Summer Games.



    Over the next two days the Olympic future of disciplines including sailing, shooting, equestrianism, synchronised swimming and badminton mixed doubles will come under International Olympic Committee microscope - and their governing bodies are taking the threat deadly seriously.



    "We regard this as a very serious case and will fight it hard... and with anything we have got to keep mixed doubles in the Olympic Games," International Badminton Federation Director of Marketing Andrew Ryan told Reuters.



    "At the highest level of all, mixed doubles is not an add-on. Players who are at the absolute top of the world in men's and women's doubles also compete in the mixed."



    In sailing, the keelboat class is also under threat but the International Sailing Federation is adamant that the IOC opinion that keelboat events should be reduced due to the cost and complexity, is not justified.



    The ISAF says removing keelboats from the Olympic programme would have a negative impact on the current events in the Paralympic Regatta and insist they must choose which, if any, medal sport is dropped.



    Whatever the IOC decides is bound to be met with criticism, but IOC President Jacques Rogge's mandate is to limit the Games' size and scope.



    After decades of expansionism under former Olympic President Juan Antonio Samaranch, Belgian Rogge wants to keep costs down so that a majority of countries can afford to host an Olympics, keeping the Games truly global.



    However, he also wants to add new sports -- including golf and rugby union sevens -- to the Games.



    Entire sports are safe until, at least, after the Athens Olympics after IOC members voted at their Session in November to put off a decision until after the 2004 Summer Games to throw out baseball, modern pentathlon and softball.



    Emotional pleas from the leaders of those sports provided a stay of execution but now individual disciplines face the axe.



    "We are very well aware that many sports depend for their future on the Olympic Games," Rogge said earlier this week. "This is a big factor but it should not always be a paralysing factor because we have to keep the Games interesting, especially for younger generations.



    "We can't see the Games being static for too long," he warned.



    "This is really the first time we have limited the expansion of the Games," Rogge said earlier this week. "What we are doing is revising the competitions."



    But the IBF's Ryan said that axing badminton mixed doubles would do nothing to aid Rogge in his aim.



    "If you are a world class men's doubles player or women's doubles player you are going to be at the Olympic Games anyway," he said.



    "I don't have the figures at hand but we did some calculations on the number of beds you would save and it was absolutely minimal because the players would all be there anyway for the other disciplines
     
  2. bigredlemon

    bigredlemon Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,096
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    T.O.
    He wants to keep the olympics interesting to younger people and reduce the costs of hosting the games so it seems only logical to... add golf!! :rolleyes:
     
  3. nSmash

    nSmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2002
    Messages:
    376
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Computer Engineer
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    I agree with Rogge. Golf courses are really cheap to build and maintain. Not
    to mention that golf equipment and memberships cost a dime a dozen,
    especially compared to badminton and golf clubs are easily rivalling shopping
    malls as hangouts for members of the younger generation who don't want to
    add to the burden of their student loans. We mustn't forget that the young
    people of today are now wiser, and realize the importance of staying away
    from physically punishing sports such as badminton in order to save their
    energy for use in their old age, when they would need to push through and
    hold their place among the crowds of young people who are too absorbed in
    their own games to make way for the elderly. Why? Because the tight spaces
    that golf courses can fit in is essential to controlling the expansion of the
    Games.

    Also, we all know that the greatest magicians have such quick hands that we
    can't even catch them moving i.e. they seem static. Based on this, it's logical
    to conclude that since the action in badminton is so fast, it seems static and
    hence, not good for the Olympics.

    In addition, since mixed doubles tennis exists but is not included, it's only
    politically correct that backyard badminton not steal the spotlight.

    Pure wisdom.
     
    #3 nSmash, Feb 20, 2003
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2003
  4. fan

    fan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Messages:
    185
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    us
  5. kwun

    kwun Administrator

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2002
    Messages:
    41,043
    Likes Received:
    2,066
    Occupation:
    BC Janitor
    Location:
    Santa Clara, CA, USA
    thanks goodness.

    if anything, i think they need to trim swimming and track-n-field. those are the real medal hogs.
     

Share This Page