Yonex Armortec 900P Vs Victor Super Waves 35

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by auggy79, Oct 3, 2010.

  1. auggy79

    auggy79 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    Hey Guys,

    Currently I'm using the Amortec 900P for my singles game. I love it due to the power it generates but recently I am considering getting the Victor Super Waves 35 to try but do not wanna waste my money if both racquets are pretty similar.
    Anyone whom has tried both of these racquets care to comment? :confused:
     
  2. LD rules!

    LD rules! Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    235
    Location:
    Earth
    Sorry double post....
     
    #2 LD rules!, Oct 3, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2010
  3. LD rules!

    LD rules! Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,306
    Likes Received:
    235
    Location:
    Earth
    Victor SW35 is in my opinion a lot better than AT900p, it is more powerful, stiffer, better control, and more manueverable. In my opinion the SW35 is well worth your money.:)
     
  4. auggy79

    auggy79 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    Thanks for the reply! Another concern is because of the head heaviness of the Amortec I find it a bit slow defensively and after a while my arms start to get tired.... How is the head heaviness and swing speed for the SW35 as compared to AT900P?
     
  5. auggy79

    auggy79 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    Another question: Is there a significant difference between the 3U and 4U version of the SW35? Which one would you guys prefer?
     
  6. ucantseeme

    ucantseeme Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Occupation:
    Z-Force II
    Location:
    Z-ForceII
    I own the SW 35 3U3G. The defence is quite good, and it doesn't feel too head heavy like the AT900P in my opinion. But don't get me wrong, it's a powerful beast. If you choose the 4U version it can lack in terms of power.
     
  7. TigerSmash

    TigerSmash Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    41
    Location:
    UK
    I have this feeling sometimes, I own a 900P 3UG5 and have thought about SW35 (only because every thread LD_Rules post's he is marketing the racket :p), but on a serious note, it doesn't really appeal to me... anyone have any insights on sw35? is there a review somewhere?
     
  8. ucantseeme

    ucantseeme Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Occupation:
    Z-Force II
    Location:
    Z-ForceII
  9. auggy79

    auggy79 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    Thanks for the comments guys..... Had a difficult time deciding btw the 3U and 4U version but in the end I purchased the 3U SW35. Have not tried the racquet on the court yet but inital feel is that it feels heavier than my AT900P but gives a very solid feel when I swing it probably due to the stiff shaft. Kind of concerned that this is a taxing racquet for the wrist and forehand.
     
  10. Fidget

    Fidget Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2008
    Messages:
    3,664
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Canada
    So, auggy79, are you enjoying your purchase?:confused::)
    Is it a better racquet for you than your AT900P?
     
  11. HardSmasher

    HardSmasher Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2007
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Senior Engineer
    Location:
    Penang,Malaysia.
    anyone know difference of the 2 rackets in term of vibration? pls help to comment.
     

Share This Page