User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 31
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default How can you judge optimal string tension without testing all tensions / string comb?

    Lately, I've been lending my spare racket to people in my badminton group to test out.

    One of the things we noticed was that almost all the players , even the ones who just started a month or two ago said their shots improved from their unknown tension default string tension, to my loner racket which is strung at 24lbs over a year ago. Most notably mid court drives were much crisper. Some gained power in smashes while others lost power. One thing that did seem to suffer for a large majority of the players was the distance of their clears. Some more than others.

    I also tested out their rackets, the tension ranged from super trampoline (less than 18) to maybe 24lbs.

    I didn't find that my power improved in the backcourt with lower tension which is where it is needed for me. Actually i would say for lower tension i could generate X power consistently regardless of effort but i had a tough time smashing as hard or clearing as fast as my 26lb tension, and i guess we could say it gave more power in the front court which i find kind of useless.

    So I am wondering, Is it possible to tell if moving up or down tension is more optimal for someone just by watching them play with their current tension, or if there is other characteristics to look for that would indicate they needed to up or down their tension?

    I am considering stringing 28lbs+ next time.
    Last edited by vipjun; 10-10-2010 at 09:13 PM.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,876
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There is no magic number for each individual, testing is the only way to find out. The way i found out my tension range yrs ago is the same, i increased and decreased the string tension. When you increase the tension and your shots are weaker and feels that you need to hit harder, it simply means the tension is too high. Also the same case when you lowered the tension if it does not improve your power (regardless how hard you hit) it simply means your swing speed and power is faster and stronger than the speed of the string bed snapping back .

    If you are currently using 24lbs, i suggest to go to 26lbs. This is to prevent your body from injury caused by the shock of requiring to hit faster/harder.

  3. #3
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,328
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Re tension: it's been generally accepted that
    hi tension = accuracy
    lo tension = power

    The tension we prefer to play with is hence a compromise between accuracy and power, depending on our swing speed and technique.

    It's also been said the optimal tension is one that is as low as we can tolerate for control and touch shots AND still not so high that we can't clear baseline to baseline.

  4. #4
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Re tension: it's been generally accepted that
    hi tension = accuracy
    lo tension = power

    The tension we prefer to play with is hence a compromise between accuracy and power, depending on our swing speed and technique.

    It's also been said the optimal tension is one that is as low as we can tolerate for control and touch shots AND still not so high that we can't clear baseline to baseline.
    beg to differ.

    in this link, you can find the general accepted theory that we believe is the closest to experimental result, applies to string tension as well:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...lity-explained

    in other words, if you can hit hard with a fast swing, higher tension will give more power (and control).

    if you cannot hit hard (like a beginner), lower tension will give more power (but less control)

  5. #5
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,328
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    beg to differ.

    in this link, you can find the general accepted theory that we believe is the closest to experimental result, applies to string tension as well:

    http://www.badmintoncentral.com/foru...lity-explained

    in other words, if you can hit hard with a fast swing, higher tension will give more power (and control).

    if you cannot hit hard (like a beginner), lower tension will give more power (but less control)
    Ahhh, that is only true up to a point.
    Eventually one will hit a wall where the tension is so high that one cannot hit hard and fast consistently all the time to get power from higher tension, even pros...

  6. #6
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Ahhh, that is only true up to a point.
    Eventually one will hit a wall where the tension is so high that one cannot hit hard and fast consistently all the time to get power from higher tension, even pros...

    the limit that you talk about is around 30-35lbs. beyond that, we will start seeing limits from human ability and material strength. so for the range we are interested in, the theory seems sounds so far.

    it is much more accurate than the "high tension more control, low tension more power" theory.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    111
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I wasn't aware this applies to strings as well but makes sense, thnx kwun.

    Is shaft stiffness and string tension mutually correlated ?
    For example will increasing string tension by say 4lbs have the same result as going from mid stiff to stiff?

    In what ways are the two (string & shaft) different ? if any.

    From the little experience i have it seems to me that string tension affects all shots but more so net and touch shots. While shaft flex doesn't affect my net and touch game as much.

  8. #8
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,328
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    The theory is that like a bow, the string and shaft system stores and releases its potential energy upon the shuttle.

    So, if you're strong enough to bend a stiff bow (or stiff string/shaft system), then you can get more energy out of it and transferred onto the shuttle.

    On touch/net shots, the power involved obviously is too low to bend the shaft. However, the feel and accuracy of the shuttle is better with higher tension string.

  9. #9
    Regular Member pBmMalaysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Kuching, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Posts
    4,718
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    from my past experience as a stringer,

    i can still recall most players prefer a higher pulling tension than they should.

    basically, they feel they are more powerful (because of the higher pitch sound produced upon shuttle impact) when they smash!

    and they don't mind feeling powerful when smashing while their opponent keeps retrieving!

    until they got pain in their wrist, arm or burn a hole in their pocket they start to reduce.
    with a high tension especially in doubles it is very difficult to control netting among the intermediate level.

    thus, the best is try to find your own ideal pulling tension.Q

  10. #10
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    35,918
    Mentioned
    54 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    agree with PBM.

    the theory is sound given your observation.

    the optimal tension is different for everyone.

    for each person, as they increase tension from very low tension, they will have little power from the racket, as the tension goes higher, they get more power. however, at one point, they will reach a maxima/optimal point that give them the most power for their technique/strength. if they try to increase tension further, they will realize the stringbed feels like a wooden board and will start to lose power.

    the optimal point, however, is different for everyone. and for stronger players, the optimal point is usually higher. for pros, their optimal point is usually around 30 lbs give or take.

    for recreational players, some can hit really hard, some cannot. therefore, for people who do not know what their optimal power, we recommend a low-medium tension of 23lbs to start with.

  11. #11
    Regular Member ctjcad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    u.s.a.
    Posts
    19,157
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vipjun View Post
    ...
    So I am wondering, Is it possible to tell if moving up or down tension is more optimal for someone just by watching them play with their current tension, or if there is other characteristics to look for that would indicate they needed to up or down their tension?

    I am considering stringing 28lbs+ next time.
    ..also, consider the stiffness of the racket one is using; e.g. stiff, mid-flex and flexible...I think for most people, at least recreational or amateur players like most of us, the optimal string tension would fall below 30 lbs (as kwun mentioned); i would even consider there's a range of optimal tension (24-28lbs) rather than 1 specific tension (remember the fresh string tension which we start with will loosen up as we play)..

  12. #12
    Regular Member Mark A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    St Helens, UK
    Posts
    4,161
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Being able to clear, forehand, from one far corner to the other is a good basic indicator of whether the string is too tight - if they can't, it is.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    That's correct. Being able to bend the limbs of a bow is what counts! Actually, the bow string doesn't do anything other than to transfer the stored energy from the limbs to the arrow. The ideal bow string is one that doesn't stretch . Now, I am not sure if the same analogy is applicable to badminton racket and string.

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    The theory is that like a bow, the string and shaft system stores and releases its potential energy upon the shuttle.

    So, if you're strong enough to bend a stiff bow (or stiff string/shaft system), then you can get more energy out of it and transferred onto the shuttle.

    On touch/net shots, the power involved obviously is too low to bend the shaft. However, the feel and accuracy of the shuttle is better with higher tension string.

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    6,302
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,645
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by visor View Post
    Ahhh, that is only true up to a point.
    Eventually one will hit a wall where the tension is so high that one cannot hit hard and fast consistently all the time to get power from higher tension, even pros...
    No. The theory is still sound at high tensions but observation is limited by the individual's ability to swing fast enough. 80lbs is simply beyond the ability of any human on the planet at the moment. A machine test, however, can aid in obtaining the observation data.

    Conversely, if lower tension == higher power is a stable theory, I should get infinite power with a butterfly net. Check my comparison at:
    http://prstat.blogspot.com/2010/04/h...ter-power.html

    Personally, I flip between different tensions depending on how I feel that day. I always start with my 27lbs string and if I'm playing well and feeling really good, I switch into the 28lbs.
    Last edited by weeyeh; 10-12-2010 at 03:19 AM.

  16. #16
    Regular Member visor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    9,328
    Mentioned
    100 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weeyeh View Post
    No. The theory is still sound at high tensions but observation is limited by the individual's ability to swing fast enough. 80lbs is simply beyond the ability of any human on the planet at the moment. A machine test, however, can aid in obtaining the observation data.
    Isn't that what I said?

    Conversely, if lower tension == higher power is a stable theory, I should get infinite power with a butterfly net. Check my comparison at:
    http://prstat.blogspot.com/2010/04/h...ter-power.html
    Don't be silly. It's not even in the functional range.

    Personally, I flip between different tensions depending on how I feel that day. I always start with my 27lbs string and if I'm playing well and feeling really good, I switch into the 28lbs.
    Now this gets interesting.

    Why do you think when you're tired you can't play as well with 28 lbs vs 27 lbs?
    Last edited by visor; 10-12-2010 at 10:57 AM.

  17. #17
    Regular Member pBmMalaysia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Kuching, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Posts
    4,718
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    isn't theory of the bow and arrow to be used to compare shaft stiffness?

    when you can't pull the bow is like playing with a racket the shaft too stiff.

    for this, i was wondering when will there be such a technology for a flexible shaft,

    once bent, to have ten times faster repulsion than the current shaft in the market.

    then we can have our racket really working for us,

    imagine the stiffer shalf will give 10 x 5 times more power?

    meanwhile can only wait and flex all new rackets in the market..

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Optimal String for Plastic Shuttles
    By Coolcool in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 9
    : 03-22-2009, 02:26 PM
  2. newbie question about string tension (2 tensions?)
    By invisbear in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 2
    : 01-21-2009, 02:59 PM
  3. optimal string model for armortec 900 power
    By BackAttack in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 25
    : 10-06-2008, 01:43 PM
  4. String tensions for optimal power
    By Confused in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 120
    : 09-06-2008, 11:50 PM
  5. string and tension for optimal power for ti-10
    By n00b in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 12
    : 03-14-2004, 06:12 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •