Difference that TXH makes?

**volcom** · 11-21-2010, 10:17 AM

It seems to me amazingly whenever TXH is by LD's side, he performs amazingly well....
Like his talisman.
Thoughts about the legendary Txh?

**wisdomcivet** · 11-21-2010, 10:21 AM

I wonder how good if TXH become LCW coach?!

He is the one that Rudy Hartono afraid to play with old old time ago..

Originally Posted by volcom

It seems to me amazingly whenever TXH is by LD's side, he performs amazingly well....
Like his talisman.
Thoughts about the legendary Txh?

**ctjcad** · 11-21-2010, 12:50 PM

Originally Posted by volcom

It seems to me amazingly whenever TXH is by LD's side, he performs amazingly well....
Like his talisman.
Thoughts about the legendary Txh?

..one OTB (and maybe a few others) will definitely agree with you..i, OTOH, think THX's presence (sitting behind) during LD's match matters less..remember in this yr's WC when LD lost to PSH, who were sitting behind there?..

Originally Posted by wisdomcivet

I wonder how good if TXH become LCW coach?!
..

..that certainly is an interesting question..

**volcom** · 11-21-2010, 06:46 PM

Originally Posted by ctjcad

..one OTB (and maybe a few others) will definitely agree with you..i, OTOH, think THX's presence (sitting behind) during LD's match matters less..remember in this yr's WC when LD lost to PSH, who were sitting behind there?..

..that certainly is an interesting question..

Iirc tang Xian hu was sitting with Wang Lin when ld played park in wc

**suetyan** · 11-21-2010, 09:38 PM

Tang Xianhu did not present right when LD lost to LCW in the JO this year

Only for LD v. LCW match, if TXH were there, LD will win. Not to talk about against other players, only LCW.

**danielwong** · 11-21-2010, 09:44 PM

LD is good...dont need TXH also can beat LCW...
but with TXH around he can perform much more better...

**suetyan** · 11-21-2010, 09:46 PM

Originally Posted by danielwong

LD is good...dont need TXH also can beat LCW...
but with TXH around he can perform much more better...

no la, you see, TXH was not with him at JO, then he lost to LCW

**Bbn** · 11-21-2010, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by suetyan

no la, you see, TXH was not with him at JO, then he lost to LCW

More likely he lost in JO because he was not well prepared or at his peak.

**suetyan** · 11-21-2010, 09:53 PM

Originally Posted by Bbn

More likely he lost in JO because he was not well prepared or at his peak.

he just wants to observe LCW

**danielwong** · 11-21-2010, 10:01 PM

Originally Posted by suetyan

he just wants to observe LCW

i heard LD not keen to win?
just want to give the title to LCW?
LOL

**Bbn** · 11-21-2010, 10:03 PM

Originally Posted by suetyan

he just wants to observe LCW

it is a possibility, and normal strategy, lose the battle but win the war,no one can win everything.

**suetyan** · 11-21-2010, 10:04 PM

Originally Posted by danielwong

i heard LD not keen to win?
just want to give the title to LCW?
LOL

yes la, he just wants to observe, not keen to win. LD will never give the thing he WANTS to other people, unless he DOES NOT WANT it

**danielwong** · 11-21-2010, 10:13 PM

Originally Posted by suetyan

yes la, he just wants to observe, not keen to win. LD will never give the thing he WANTS to other people, unless he DOES NOT WANT it

hahha....your real point is out...

**Bbn** · 11-21-2010, 10:13 PM

Originally Posted by suetyan

yes la, he just wants to observe, not keen to win. LD will never give the thing he WANTS to other people, unless he DOES NOT WANT it

Not the best word, observe, TEST is a better word.

Just like your ACCA or CIMA tests.

**danielwong** · 11-21-2010, 10:16 PM

Originally Posted by Bbn

Not the best word, observe, TEST is a better word.

Just like your ACCA or CIMA tests.

I am just a bit suprised as LD is superior than LCW all the time
no doubt...the results at OG 2008 clearly shows that...
he dont need to observe or test LCW at all...
maybe JO LD really dont want the title....but LD doesnt need to observe LCW...
he can take down LCW anytime...

**Bbn** · 11-21-2010, 10:20 PM

Originally Posted by danielwong

I am just a bit suprised as LD is superior than LCW all the time
no doubt...the results at OG 2008 clearly shows that...
he dont need to observe or test LCW at all...
maybe JO LD really dont want the title....but LD doesnt need to observe LCW...
he can take down LCW anytime...

Hey dont be so "Khua Cheung". LCW is actually as good as LD but I think he loses out in terms of back-up and strategies.

The game now is quite physical, other things being equal, winning shots dont count, you have to assess or test opponent's physical condition and plan how to "conk" him out.

**danielwong** · 11-21-2010, 10:26 PM

Originally Posted by Bbn

Hey dont be so "Khua Cheung". LCW is actually as good as LD but I think he loses out in terms of back-up and strategies.

The game now is quite physical, other things being equal, winning shots dont count, you have to assess or test opponent's physical condition and plan how to "conk" him out.

you need to let people hear nice words and things they want...baru syiok...