User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 17 of 19
  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Post Carbonex Comparison Cab20 Power Cab20 Muscle Cab23

    I finally got my Cab23 the other day and here is a comparison between my 3 Cab racquets. I have a Cab20 Power which was purchased in 1996, and Cab23 and Cab20 Muscle which were purchased in 2003.

    All playing tests were done with Yonex feather shuttlecocks (AS-50) and balance points were measured with the string on the racquets. Flexibility was measured by hand by placing the racquets flat on a wooden table, and pressing down at the top of the shaft(near the racquet head) until it touched the table.

    Cab20 Muscle US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 299mm
    Cab20 Power US (2U-G4) string w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 302mm
    Cab23 US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 295mm

    Of the three racquets, the Cab20 Muscle is definitely the most flexible. The Cab20 Power and Cab23 are very close in terms of stiffness and unfortunately I am unable to tell which is stiffer without the use of sophisticated equipment. As for balance, the Cab20 Power is the most head-heavy with a balance point 302mm from the end on the grip. The Cab 20 Muscle was 299mm, and to my surprise the Cab23 was the least head-heavy of the three with a balance point of 295mm.

    All three racquets were similar in terms of playability. The Cab20 Power had the most powerful smash but it was the least maneuverable on defense probably because it is the most head-heavy. The Cab20 Muscle and Cab23 had pretty much the same smashing power even though the Cab20 Muscle was more head-heavy. I am guessing that the high stiffness of the Cab23 made a difference in smashing compared to the Cab20 Muscle. Also, the Cab23 made a louder noise in smashing than the Cab20 Muscle even though I was using the same string at the same tension. I'm guessing that the high stiffness of the Cab23 gives it a louder smash sound. On defense, the Cab23 was definitely the fastest. The Cab20 Power had a nice feel to it on defense but that was probably because I was most used to it.

    Overall the racquets were very similar. My favorite of the three is still probably the Cab20 Power, but a lot of that is because of sentimental value. I was quite impressed with the playability of the Cab23 and the smashes were unusually powerful considering it was the least head-heavy of the three racquets.

    In the future, I hope to weigh all 3 racquets with an electronic scale. ( Maybe I can sneak into one of my campus' chem labs and use one of scales they have there). The racquets are all 2U (90-94grams) and have US serial numbers but it would be interesting to see exactly how much these weigh in relation to each other. Also, I hope to experiment with different strings/tensions. I'll keep posting what I find here.

  2. #2
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    432
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Very informative review; thank you.

  3. #3
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,130
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    great comparison.

    one question, isnt' the cab23 a long racket? that will affect the balance as well...

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Wiltshire, England
    Posts
    296
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Good review AMRaider, that is how is should be done. Doesn't look good for the Cab 20 MS does it? I am hoping to have a hit with a demo soon but the racquet has been released with little or no publicity over here.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Beautiful British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    432
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have this racket (cab 23) and it measures "regular".

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kwun,

    I just measured the overall length of all three racquets and they were within 2mm of each other.
    Cab20 Power: 663mm
    Cab23 : 664mm
    Cab20 Muscle: 665mm

    Since I measured by hand, there is bound to be some margin of error; maybe a mm or two. But, it would seem as though all three racquets were originally intended to be the same length and that the Cab23 is just the "standard length". I checked Yonexs' catalogue on at shuttle-house.com and the Cab20 Muscle and Cab23 are listed as regular length racquets (664mm). The long racquets(Muscle Power series, ISO, and some of the TIs) are 674mm. Here's a link to the chart I got off of their site.

    http://www.badmintonforum.com/vb/sho...&threadid=9259

    Personally, I wish Yonex would make a Carbonex series racquet that is Long (674mm) like the Cab20 Long. I would love to try out a Long Cab racquet. Unfortunately, the Cab20 Long is no longer in production and seems dificult to find in the US. Hopefully Yonex will release a new Cab series racquet that is 674mm.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    New York, US
    Posts
    10,283
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: Carbonex Comparison Cab20 Power Cab20 Muscle Cab23

    Originally posted by AMRaider


    Of the three racquets, the Cab20 Muscle is definitely the most flexible. .
    Wow... I thought my cab20 MS (2U) is really stiff already.

    Guess it due to most of my other racket are 3U and more rated as Flex and Med Stiff.

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    2,373
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Originally posted by AMRaider
    Kwun,

    I just measured the overall length of all three racquets and they were within 2mm of each other.
    Cab20 Power: 663mm
    Cab23 : 664mm
    Cab20 Muscle: 665mm

    Since I measured by hand, there is bound to be some margin of error; maybe a mm or two. But, it would seem as though all three racquets were originally intended to be the same length and that the Cab23 is just the "standard length". I checked Yonexs' catalogue on at shuttle-house.com and the Cab20 Muscle and Cab23 are listed as regular length racquets (664mm). The long racquets(Muscle Power series, ISO, and some of the TIs) are 674mm. Here's a link to the chart I got off of their site.
    Marginal differences could also be dued to the fact that the racquets are all strung. Unstrung regular length racquets should be at 665mm and usually "Long" racquets are 10mm longer.

    AMR, good review. Would be nice to be able to come up with a consistent test (that us regular folks can do) to measure stiffness. This way, comments on stiffness will be consistent as stiffness for racquets varies from manufacturer to manufacturer.

  9. #9
    Administrator kwun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Santa Clara, California, United States
    Posts
    36,130
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    ah.... my mistake about the long-ness of cab23....

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Question

    AMRaider,

    Did your Cab 23 means Cab 23 Muscle Power (New one)?

    Thanks!

  11. #11
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Bay Area
    Posts
    607
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the cab23 ms is the only version of the racket. it just has 2 colors. its been out forever.... like say 3-4 years i believe?

  12. #12
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    108
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks TrunkZ69

    In fact, I means the Cab 23 Muscle Power mentioned in www.yonex.co.jp > products > rackets catalogue. It seems still available.

  13. #13
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The Cab23 is the same as the one on Yonex's USA website. It's red and black and I purchased it in March of 2003.

    http://www.yonex.com/badminton_carbonex.cfm
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  14. #14
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    TW
    Posts
    3,949
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting, I know some places have Cab23 Long.

    Such as www.badminton.net, at $99

    Maybe it's just Cab23 has both regular and long versions.

  15. #15
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Lightbulb Carbonex Comparison Cab20 CN Cab20 Tour Special SP

    Just thought I would add some data to my Carbonex Comparison thread. I just measured the balance points of a Cab20 CN, and a Cab20 Tour Special SP with NO string.

    Cab20 CN (2U-G4) unstrung. Balance: 289mm
    Cab20 Tour Special SP unstrung. Balance: 280mm

    It's a little difficult to compare these new balance points with the old ones since my previous measurements were done on racquets with string. Before I restring my Cab20 Power and Cab23, I'll be sure to measure their balance points unstrung and add the data to this thread.

    Cab20 Muscle US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 299mm
    Cab20 Power US (2U-G4) string w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 302mm
    Cab23 US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 295mm

    I did my best to judge the stiffness of the Cab20 CN and the Cab20 Tour Special SP. The Cab20 Tour Special SP was similar in stiffness to the Cab20 Muscle. The Cab 20 CN was a little more flexible than the Cab20 Tour Special SP although it was definitely more head-heavy than Cab20 Tour Special SP. The Cab20 Power and the Cab23 are the stiffest Cab racquets I have seen so far.

  16. #16
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    184
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Just got some more data: I measured the balance point of my Cab23 US (2U-G4) unstrung. FYI, all racquets tested were 2U-G4.

    Cab20 CN (2U-G4) unstrung. Balance: 289mm
    Cab20 Tour Special SP (2U-G4) unstrung. Balance: 280mm
    Cab23 US (2U-G4) unstrung. Balance: 285mm

    Cab20 Muscle US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 299mm
    Cab20 Power US (2U-G4) string w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 302mm
    Cab23 US (2U-G4) strung w/BG80@21lbs. Balance: 295mm

  17. #17
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Basement Boiler Room
    Posts
    22,118
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    AMR, i hope u were using same overgrip on all your cabs

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. cab20 tour sp vs cab20 special
    By linlin in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 20
    : 01-03-2006, 05:15 AM
  2. cab20 tour sp or cab20 sp or cab22
    By kitsy in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 2
    : 11-14-2005, 10:23 PM
  3. Difference btw Cab20 And Cab20 Special
    By Mr_Dangerfield in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 0
    : 08-16-2005, 05:23 AM
  4. cab20 n cab20 Muscle Power qns
    By noinimod in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 9
    : 04-16-2004, 03:22 AM
  5. cab20 and cab23
    By angelus_2012 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 1
    : 04-25-2003, 06:01 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •