User Tag List

Page 24 of 32 FirstFirst ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LastLast
Results 392 to 408 of 531
  1. #392
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    singapore
    Posts
    116
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    and for the battle of thin gauge, ZM62N beats NBG98 hands down. slightly stiffer feeling and more feel on the ZM62N, and with even more explosiveness than NBG98.

    durability might be NBG98 is better, but to be honest with everyone here, i have never broken a ZM62N. no matter how hard i tried to hit with it.

    i have a friend who just had his racket strung with NBG98@25lbs. i gave him my racket with ZM62N to try, he gave me his other racket and ask me to cut the strings and put the ZM62N on it. he is getting way more repulsion from the ZM62 than the NBG98.
    Well, i cant agree more than that. In the past, i use 66UM and after i tried Z62. I had given up on all yonex strings.

  2. #393
    Regular Member BlueTornado's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Bay Area, USA
    Posts
    793
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Isn't NBG98 a 0.66 string? I don't disagree that Zymax is better than Nanogy in almost any aspect, but I'm sure that the thickness difference probably causes a lot of the differences in the repulsion of the string compared to ZM62N.

  3. #394
    Regular Member Alapongtai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kwun View Post
    and for the battle of thin gauge, ZM62N beats NBG98 hands down. slightly stiffer feeling and more feel on the ZM62N, and with even more explosiveness than NBG98.

    durability might be NBG98 is better, but to be honest with everyone here, i have never broken a ZM62N. no matter how hard i tried to hit with it.

    i have a friend who just had his racket strung with NBG98@25lbs. i gave him my racket with ZM62N to try, he gave me his other racket and ask me to cut the strings and put the ZM62N on it. he is getting way more repulsion from the ZM62 than the NBG98.
    how does zm62 hit compared to bg66 and bg80? and have u tried zm65?

  4. #395
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yan.v View Post
    I tried ZM62 last week on my Z-Slash, and it was definitely "wow" when smashing, however the string bed just exploded after a couple smashes
    I felt like Lee Yong-dae during the AE!

    Yeah, thin strings + winter + Canada + slight miss hits =
    Lol, i kinda agree with you. no wonder it is hard for Canadians to put strings on high tension... we can only blame the weather.

  5. #396
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    sgp
    Posts
    564
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kachang putih View Post
    Hi Alana, mine Z65 is white version, This is wad is feel also, sort of planky, like abit dull. . .
    just tried out the red ZM65 @ 25lbs on my old Sotx D900, surprisingly this one has more pop and feels less planky than the white ZM65 @ 24lbs on TSF500i.

  6. #397
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,857
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The red Z65 is quite nice isn't it. Crisp solid feel. I didn't buy any white b/c of the advice on this forum. (and the red looks so beautiful on my PP Trinity 1 )

  7. #398
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    557
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just ordered the 65 in red. Probably will string at 22-24. Can't wait to try it.

    I've tried the microlegend which was amazing and gave me loads more control and some power, then they went soggy and I've fallen out with the racket that they're in. About to try the micropower at 22?lbs. So I'll use that to gauge what tension I will go for.

  8. #399
    Regular Member Alapongtai's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    277
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    i got some 65 in red as well. gonna string 25-26. coming soon

  9. #400
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    557
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bit of help please. I'm very happy with .70 ashaway @ stock (22lbs I am told). For my zymax65 do I go with 19/21 to feel the same, 21/23 same tension but will feel tighter, or 23/25? Not sure if I should push for more tension as I'm getting good contact and plenty of power.

  10. #401
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just ordered 3 reels of ZM65

  11. #402
    Regular Member demolidor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    @Hollanti
    Posts
    11,734
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DuckFeet View Post
    Bit of help please. I'm very happy with .70 ashaway @ stock (22lbs I am told). For my zymax65 do I go with 19/21 to feel the same, 21/23 same tension but will feel tighter, or 23/25? Not sure if I should push for more tension as I'm getting good contact and plenty of power.
    Why even change???

  12. #403
    Regular Member DuckFeet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Swindon
    Posts
    557
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by demolidor View Post
    Why even change???
    Why not? I have not cut the previous strings, this is for another racquet so why not try something different? I see your point though, but I might be missing out

  13. #404
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    guys i am just wandering zymax62 vs bg 66um durability is better in 66um. price is better in zy62 but if strings breaks in by only one mishit and then restringing cost in the long run expensive. feel is important but cost is important as well. i am bit confused............

  14. #405
    Regular Member Maklike Tier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,171
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I liked the repulsion of ZM62, but even at 23lbs I had trouble transitioning with it. It rings louder than 66U at 26lbs! 66U could arguably be the best string out there at the moment. Great repulsion, superb tactility....but with a small concession to tension retention and durability. If durability and cost is paramount, take a look at ZM65.

  15. #406
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    40
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    how is feel and power of zy65

  16. #407
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    762
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maklike Tier View Post
    I liked the repulsion of ZM62, but even at 23lbs I had trouble transitioning with it. It rings louder than 66U at 26lbs! 66U could arguably be the best string out there at the moment. Great repulsion, superb tactility....but with a small concession to tension retention and durability. If durability and cost is paramount, take a look at ZM65.
    rings louder -> high pitch oder low pitch?
    transitioning -> do you mean you had problems to adapt to the new string?
    66U -> do you mean 66Ultimax?
    What do you mean with superb tactility (of ZM62)?

    Can you compare ZM62, ZM65 and ZM67?

    Thanks in advance :P

  17. #408
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Brunei Darussalam
    Posts
    1,638
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I also like to know in term of repulsion power of these 3 strings

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 15
    : 04-26-2012, 08:45 PM
  2. Ashaway Zymax 62 and 67
    By drew tze en in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 2
    : 03-24-2012, 04:58 PM
  3. Ashaway Zymax USA?
    By dawei94 in forum Market Place
    Replies: 11
    : 12-03-2009, 08:50 PM
  4. WTS Ashaway Zymax 62 (13 sets) SG
    By huangxl in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 1
    : 11-19-2009, 12:42 AM
  5. buy ashaway zymax in SG
    By sef3mb in forum Badminton String
    Replies: 0
    : 09-24-2009, 12:56 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •