User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: AT900T vs VT80?

  1. #1
    New Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Guelph Ontario
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default AT900T vs VT80?

    Alright, I had an AT900 a few years ago, which ended up in a clash and not surviving (I play doubbles). After that I tried a karakal MT80 - didn't like that so much. That ended up breaking when I hit the bird - wasn't a miss hit or anything, I didn't know what the hell happened to be honest. Anywho, since then I've been playing with my old backup, good ol isometric mf62... Ya I know...

    Anywho, so I need to order some new shoes, (my feet are sticking out the sides...) and I figured I would get a new racquet at the same time. Now I loved the At900T and was going to get another one, then I saw the new VT80. It looks in the same area and all, and I was thinking about giving it a try. I looked for some reviews online, but wasn't overly successful. Anyone have any idea on how the racquets compare? I do about 98% doubbles.

    Also, this is slightly off topic, but I may as well put it all in the same thread, yonex shoes, any suggestions? They're all about the same price, and I'm not sure how they are different. I tried reading some reviews, again wasn't very helpful - except the reviews said that they usually fit a 1/2 size smaller? Any thoughts there?

    Thanks for the help.

  2. #2
    Regular Member Polaroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California,USA
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I didnt use the AT900 T before but I used the AT900P before so couldn't tell you the comparison between, BUT!! however i have the VT80. For me its find with me even tho its a singles racket I found it ok playing doubles with it. I play doubles most of the time. VT80 works great for me. Although its very demanding. It took me around 4~5hrs to get used to the racket.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Barca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    KL, Malaysia
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IMO if you have been playing with AT900T, the switch to VT80 will not trouble you that much. I have no problem at all in the transition. In fact it took me just a game to adapt to it.

    I find this racket suitable for doubles game since I can defend well with it and manoeuvrability is quite good. AT900P is one which I still have problem using it for a fast doubles game. Its heavy head hinders the smash return capability.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Polaroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California,USA
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Same here I tried my friends AT900P before and just can't play defensive well. I have no problem returning smashes with my VT80.

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Mumbai
    Posts
    1,405
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, interesting that you guys say the same thing. I also find the VT80 excellent to defend with, and I'm using the 3U version. Just remind me, Polaroid, are you using the 3U or 4U VT80? I know Barca is using the 4U.

  6. #6
    Regular Member Polaroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Southern California,USA
    Posts
    203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm using the 4U VT80.

  7. #7
    New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    hi im looking at both these racquets fro mostly singles use. Thoughts?

  8. #8
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    117
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've tried my friends 3u VT80 and it didn't feel that much superior than my 3u AT900P, but the VT80 did have a more aerodynamic feel because of the frame. If I were in your situation I would probably get the VT80 if the price difference is not that big. For doubles, you might consider a faster racket if you play net a lot. Something even balance towards head heavy like Arc 10 or Victor MX 80 should also be considered.

    As for shoes, I like light ones. That's why I prefer the shb92 than the shb102. My normal shoe size is 9.5, all my badminton shoes regardless of brand are 0.5 size larger so I don't hit my toes during lunges.

  9. #9
    New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    7
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    WOuld the arc 10 be superior to the At900t or the VT80. I play mostly singles

Similar Threads

  1. Tactic Voyager VT80 racket any good compared to Yonex VT80 and Victor MX80?
    By Dave1011 in forum Badminton Rackets / Equipment
    Replies: 7
    : 04-17-2012, 03:20 PM
  2. FT: At900t for vt80 (GTA only)
    By azncloudz in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 4
    : 12-27-2011, 11:09 AM
  3. What would be the best singles-the arc 10, At900t or the VT80.
    By karl95 in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 14
    : 10-23-2011, 04:47 PM
  4. WTB/FT: Yonex Voltric 80 (VT80) G4 for either VT80 G5 or MX80 (UK, London)
    By Naim.F.C in forum Buy & Sell - Read the rules sticky before you post
    Replies: 3
    : 05-27-2011, 11:35 PM
  5. moving from at900t 4u4g to at900t 3u5g
    By Vodude in forum Racket Recommendation / Comparison
    Replies: 4
    : 03-06-2009, 10:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •