Victor Thruster K6000

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by Shinichi, Jun 11, 2013.

  1. Shinichi

    Shinichi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Brunei Darussalam
    Guilty :D.........
     
  2. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    Remeasured my TK6000 4U: 42.2g head weight, and 95.1g total weight. I can't re-measure other rackets I listed since I returned them to their owners.

    visor, for comparison, I remeasured my XP70 is 95.3g total weight with G11 grip and NS30 (0.70mm). Head weight is 41.3g and ~291mm bp. Which if I recall correctly is similar to the one you measured.
     
  3. Shinichi

    Shinichi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    Teacher
    Location:
    Brunei Darussalam
    total weight 95.1g? quite heavy
     
  4. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    I should have mentioned earlier that I had RKEP G09 grip on it and it's strung with NBG99, 4UG5. It's ~3-5g less than my normal 3Us, e.g. AT900T 3UG5 (NBG99, G09) is 98g and 43.7g head weight.
     
  5. swunk

    swunk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    Thailand
    Haha, now I have JJS too! Haven't played yet, but some first impressions: feels much head-lighter than my li-nings ) Definitely a bit head-lighter than BSLYD.
    Wet BP (strung with NS95 and with 0.6 overgrip) is 296mm.
    The racket is rather stiff, maybe a bit stiffer than BSLYD.
    Swings fast, feels quite good, should be excellent for my doubles game.
     
  6. swunk

    swunk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    46
    Location:
    Thailand
    dang, wrong topic ( so many of them and every one has a discussion about jjs )
     
  7. disci

    disci Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    hmmm how does this racket compare to vt70?

    sound like a similar racket with higher bp?
     
  8. paulstewart64

    paulstewart64 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    199
    Occupation:
    Marketing Consultant
    Location:
    Cheshire UK
  9. davlee

    davlee Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    560
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    Sales
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Couldn't wait..
     
  10. Maklike Tier

    Maklike Tier Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    73
    Occupation:
    Unoccupied
    Location:
    Australia
    Yeah, that's a bit beasty. Too beasty for me. :eek:
     
  11. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Assuming string weight is 3.4g and grip wt is 7g, then dry wt is 84.7g and dry head wt is 38.4g.

    Not too beasty :)
    Same head wt as the 4U VT80 and VTZF that I used to have. Manageable for fast MD but requires strong shoulder and forearm.
     
  12. tranqq

    tranqq Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2008
    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    kelowna, BC
    what's the best way to measure head weight?
     
  13. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
  14. SibaSt

    SibaSt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2013
    Messages:
    21
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Paris
    It doesn't feel the same as vt70. I played a lot with the 2 (TK6K is my current, and I tried vt70 for 2 months), and you really shouldn't buy one because you liked the other^^
    The difference in BP is quite big, and the TK feels more repulsive/bouncy/lively/uncontrolable to me (don't know which word fits best, but you got the idea). I you are physically agressive and always try to put speed in the shuttle, you can try the TK. If you want to control the pace more, you will not like it at all.
    (as you can guess, I'm quite mad on the court, and I love it :)
     
  15. disci

    disci Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    United States
    ahh thanks for the comparison.
    sounds like a very nice racket.
    based on that description, it actually reminds me of a slightly heavier voltric i force.
     
  16. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    TK6000 review

    Won't be as comprehensive as my usual reviews, but I think this one deserves more than the two paragraphs I gave it in the Victor thread.

    TK6000
    VS850 @ 30 PS 304/85


    Looks

    I'm not a fan of this gloss yellow - I think it makes rackets look cheap (c.f. Adidas AZT). The more "egg yolk/honeycomb" yellow worked really well on the MX60, but this "pastel" yellow... thumbs down from me.

    String pattern is terrible as well - miles of main poking out the top. OSP would have been fine.

    Power

    Strange one. The spec suggests it'll behave like a VT70... not even close. The VT70 was a soggy mess that needed a long, slow swing, but this one is tight and zippy. In all the dozens of rackets I've tried, I have to give this one the highest power/effort ratio of them all. If you need to get the shuttle out of the air with most angle as "cheaply" as possible, this is the one. It works everywhere - drives, clears, stick smash...

    It doesn't gain very much power when I go for a full smash, but I don't think it's supposed to. Players who want real beef might find it lacking a tad.

    Defence

    A 304 shouldn't defend this well - I thought I was playing with a Nanospeed. It "resets" itself so quickly I found myself walking into smashes with it. Angles ahoy once again, but horizontal this time. If you need to block, the head stays where it is. No problem.

    Control

    In all honesty, I expected the head to be all over the place - this is a 5/3, after all. However, it feels "integrated", and I think this is because it's a 4U. Thrusters are really good with frame torque (rather, lack of it).

    Feel

    It needs a bright string, but it's no slouch. It did vibrate a bit at 30 PS, but it's a 4U after all.


    Conclusion

    It's not for me - too tall and too light - but that doesn't mean I can't recognize that it's good at what it's supposed to do. I don't think it's got enough meat for the real hard-hitters, but it's so damned easy to get angle and power out of this thing you can almost turn half your brain off and let your creative side out.

    During one game yesterday I approached a loose drop shot at the net. I decided to play a spinner, but then I saw an opponent on his way in. I then showed a lift to the backhand corner... until I saw the other opponent favouring that side. Finally, I settled on an inside-out backhand drive, by which point the shuttle was nearly behind me... which ended up being a winner. Let that sink in: I managed to change my mind twice on the same shot, and still win the point off it.

    As I said in my shorter review: options.

    On a final note, I think it's such a shame that this thing is so low in the Thruster range, because it's going to be overlooked (especially given its looks). In all honesty, going just by the specs I would have walked right past it in the shop.
     
    #76 Mark A, Nov 7, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2013
  17. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    ^ Love these entertaining reviews. :D
     
  18. paulstewart64

    paulstewart64 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    1,759
    Likes Received:
    199
    Occupation:
    Marketing Consultant
    Location:
    Cheshire UK
    Mark

    Interesting review. I agree with most of what you say, however that's where the individual taste element comes in. I really like the colour. Playability was way beyond what I expected and really opened up the possibilities. Granted it's not going to be the hardest hitter, but it's still a powerhouse and enough for me to give it the two thumbs up.

    As you say, defence, net work, it's a dream.

    For me, there's nothing I don't like about this racket and lots to rave about. In fact, you can read my review as it's just gone live.

    Paul
    www.badminton-coach.co.uk
     
    #78 paulstewart64, Nov 7, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 7, 2013
  19. Maklike Tier

    Maklike Tier Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,659
    Likes Received:
    73
    Occupation:
    Unoccupied
    Location:
    Australia
    Victor UK should be super happy with your guys, you're pimpin' it big time :p A lot of people will be curious about the TK6000 now.....myself included :eek:

    A yellow grip should de-uglify it a bit.....
     
  20. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    This is the difficulty in reviewing: evaluating the thing for what it is instead of what we want it to be. It's got to the point where I have to think not only "do I like this?" but also "would I like this were I the target audience?"

    In the case of the TK6000, it was "yes", and "YES".

    Let's see how a maniac's string job changes the equation... you might have to give it seven out of five.
     

Share This Page