Agreed 1000%. I remember when I was in Sunday School, they taught me, "God doesn't like arrogant people."
No...your language is too arrogant...just be humble like LYD...trust me..LYD is a humble and friendly player including HTW, the coach...I have met him many times...
The problem with some guys here is that they don't want to accept the stats, especially between JJS/LYD-MK/HS. They always mentioning "The Danes" altogether.
Do you think you're humbly approaching to me when you advising it to me? When they are doing well, I praise them, when they are doing badly, I indicate their faults.
last few tournaments, Kido's knee is still not well....plus the way you mentioned it like Kido's olympic or WC are nothing...thats why we mention Danes, INA MD that your pair hardly beat them....in 2008...Kido/Hendra lost to your pair 2 times only ( in Thomas cup and SS Final)..
My question is simple, you use the following title in your post: While they clearly have been dominated by the Danes. So what exactly is soo dominating about the Korea MD if they're been dominated by other pair???
Is this a humble posting??? I advise you to check the previous posts about my definition of dominance.
I believe that type of sentence is refer to as question. As far as your definition of dominance, refer back to the counter argument, and do show how you call your Korean MD as Dominating when they've been dominated by other.
Yes, I have followed all the story. So I said before Kido would be better to take some rests for his recovery. Kindra had one more loss in Swiss Open Final before Olympic to be accurate. And sorry if you are offended by my strong words.
Not showing their consistency???? I believe LYD/JJS had not won a match against the Danes duo of LP/JR for the whole 2008! That's not consistent enough for you??
No problem...you are welcome.. JJS/LYD is one of strong team..but they are not dominating yet... Because in 2008: LYD/JJS won 4 titles: AE,Swiss, Hongkong and China Open (2) MK/HS won 5 titles: Olympis, MAS, China Open (1), French and DEnmark.. Lets say that no pair is really dominating in MD...it is good for sport...we still have Chinese MD, danes MD, MAS MD plus nathan/Clark...
Hum.. you seem to not reading the posts. I can understand why you are saying so. Just browse back to a couple of pages.
Just doesn't want to misunderstand what you're trying to say, so could you direct to the specific post?
Yeah, that's the difference when considering the stats. I care for the h-2-h stats among them. But many people care for the titles.
As you know, the thread has a bunch of stories connected post by post. You need to follow the storyline if you don't want to misunderstand.
well...if you care about H to H then you lose to DENmark and INA MD ( Luluk/Alvent).... Did you know that PSH lost to Sasaki like 3 times last year ? only this year PSH beat him...do you still care about H to H?
Sure, as you know, badminton has a game playing with opponents. It's not a game of records. So h-2-h is very important in this field. In the case of PSH, he might have some weak points to beat Sasaki. And I care for recent(1~2 years around) stats as the point-system has changed.
