Wow those are some end-loaded rackets!!! 300+ After seeing what happened to your amp95 Im sure you go the muscles to swing it. What happened to the good ol' woven7?
BP of 306? That is quite a lot but I must admit I'm quite surprised - I thought the panda would like a higher BP for when he's hitting his racket breaking smash Anyway, Dink, I hope you manage to get it exactly how you want.
No wonder you are posting less and less. Master, you are moving toward the 'wrong' direction. It's power, more poWER and ultimate POWER!!
Yeah Kwun , I'm very eager for them reviews aswell Thinking about pm'ing Kwun - but last time I pm'ed Kwun I never got a response :crying::crying:
I also got this arcsaber10 racquet..But i'm still confuse...how do we know if our raquet is fake??HElp..some of u guys said..Theres a wave in the t joint..wat is it??can somebody explain to me..wheres the t joint??..
The T-joint is what connects the frame and shaft together. Just post the serial code in this forum and we can tell you if it is fake or not.
Many have asked. Plenty have pleaded. Some have begged. A few have threatened. And now the prodded Panda is about to deliver? Whatever this updated review says, it'll prompt at least 1,000 posts. Huge drum-roll please......
Thanks for the updated review Dinkalot. Out of Lethal 50 and Tantrum 200 which one do you prefer and why?
hey dink nice review but if given a choice should i choose a yonex nanospeed 7700 or 9000s, as both the durability of shaft and frame u graded are the same(durability issue vry important to me) but for u which u think would be better for a intermediate(all around but prefer abit more smashing) like me
Nanospeed Ti10 purple? Is that name right? Im just shocked the carvel u3 u4 made your list of panda approved rackets.
"Panda plays doubles and mixed so Panda used the Lethal 50. If singles, the Nano Pro 9900. For all-around, bias towards attacking: Lethal 50, swings like an 88g moderately end weight racket. Tantrum 200, similar to the L50 but swings 2-3g lighter" .