Victor TK8000 VS Meteor X60

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by kvn4000, Feb 25, 2013.

  1. kvn4000

    kvn4000 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    sales manager
    Location:
    Malaysia
    This should be an interesting comparison, both are medium flex and head heavy :)What say you?
     
    #1 kvn4000, Feb 25, 2013
  2. clawhammers

    clawhammers Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2011
    Messages:
    875
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    Jakarta
    I say TK8000's stiffness is greater than MX60

    (probably equal to MX70)

    subscribing this thread to see other's opinion :D
     
    #2 clawhammers, Feb 26, 2013
  3. Licin

    Licin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,107
    Likes Received:
    21
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Asia
    Boss, could i borrow your TK8000, i am so eager to try it ....:D
     
    #3 Licin, Feb 26, 2013
  4. Blessed Kawa

    Blessed Kawa Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Financial Consultant
    Location:
    Petaling Jaya
    Hi kvn4000,

    I know you are a big fan of MX60. Have u tried MX London? How is it compare to it? Is MX60 more powerful and easier to generate power? Appreciate your opinion or anybody can share pls?
     
    #4 Blessed Kawa, Feb 27, 2013
  5. Porky

    Porky Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    392
    Likes Received:
    5
    Location:
    Singapore
    Eh, i thought MX-60 is even balanced? Not considered head heavy definitely
     
    #5 Porky, Mar 3, 2013
  6. renbo

    renbo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,805
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    HK
    The mx-60 is head heavy racquet. Well, the way Victor does head heavy racquet, that is moderately head heavy. It must be more or less the same as the mx-70 and 80. The thruster gave me the impression of being a little more head heavy, but just by holding the racquet (I did not play with it).
     
    #6 renbo, Mar 3, 2013
  7. amleto

    amleto Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    2,890
    Likes Received:
    89
    Location:
    UK
    definitely incorrect.
     
    #7 amleto, Mar 3, 2013
  8. Blessed Kawa

    Blessed Kawa Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2011
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Financial Consultant
    Location:
    Petaling Jaya
    Does it mean with the head heaviness and mid flex the mx60 would be easier to generate power in the smash for those who doesn't has a big arm to flex stiff & heavy racket like 3U VT80? Does that make sense? Anyone can share?
     
    #8 Blessed Kawa, Mar 3, 2013
  9. kvn4000

    kvn4000 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    sales manager
    Location:
    Malaysia
    U are right about consistency generating power from x60. Never played x70 before but in hand swinging feel doesn't attract me :)
     
    #9 kvn4000, Mar 3, 2013
  10. renbo

    renbo Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    2,805
    Likes Received:
    247
    Location:
    HK
    The mx-60 is indeed good for smashing. That is the racquet I use now and in comparison to my previous one, the arcsaber 8dx, it is much more easy to generate power.
    But i don't think it has to do with 'big arm'. It is about your ability to concentrate the strenght given to the swing at the good moment, i.e. at the impact. The mid flex racquet will help those, like me, who do not have the appropriate technique to fully concentrate our effort.
     
    #10 renbo, Mar 3, 2013

Share This Page