armortec 900 power?armortec 900 technique?or armortec 700?

That has to be a at700 then. 700 has a relatively flexy shaft even though it says its stiff. Has a bigger sweetspot. Head heavy, and can hit pretty hard.

As for which is lighter, it depends which weight category u choose.

AT900's can come in 3U or 4U. The at700 comes in 3U. If you look at the cone of your 900P, and like the weight, then go for the same with the 700.

 

agree with slicedbanana, from your last postings i would recommend at700. the at900technique feels a little lighter compared to at700 and swings faster (balancepoint and aeroshape).

 

AT900-P and AT700 are not perfectly interchangable. Change from AT700 to 900-P will have some problem at timing/ position / wrist usage. However, I think it worth the effort to change.

 

They say AT700, and i agree with them. If u have AT900P then why try to adept to it?

 

"ohh,, so what racket? i want a lesser stiff than armortec 900 power and has the power to smash."

if that´s what you really want, take at700. i don´t see any problems with frame-durability from my experience. mine are strung 26x28

 

dear all, how would you rate the ns9k type x according to the list above? I am confusing about chosing at700, at800 off and ns9k type x, any recommendation? thanks a lot

 

The NS9k is a head light racket. All of the ones mentioned above are head heavy. Defensively, the ns9k is better than the rest because its easier to manoeuvre due to its head lightness. In terms of power, one has to have a fast swing and good strength to be able to get full power out of the ns9k as it is extra stiff. The same goes for the 900P as well.

To be fair, I'm not sure what you are looking for, so can you elaborate more? they are all good rackets.

 

hi Slicedbanana07, thanks for your prompt reply, I have used ns8k and at800de for quite a time, but I think I need a more head heavy racket, which is good for smash as well as single. Now I have chance to trade the at800de for 1 of the above rackets. Then I am confusing, I actually want to try all of them . Since those are 2nd hand rackets, durability is an issue, so far ns9k type x is most durable racket among them (correct if I am wrong). I am an intermediate-advance player, has played badminton for 6 years, I think my wrist is strong enough to handle them.
Thanks
edited: I discovered the at800off is G3, then I don't like it, now only at700 3ug4 and ns9ktype x

 

I want to know if anyone has a comparison of the AT700 to the AT900 but specifically both in 4U not 3U?