That confuses me. I mean, if the SW37 has the same BP as the BS12, why would you buy it? I thought the SW series was the head-heavy hammerfest line of rackets??
SW37 = BS12 Stiff 00000 Flex HH 00000 HL Spira 22 = MX70 Stiff ooooo Flex HH ooooo HL Spira 21 = MX80 Stiff ooooo Flex HH ooooo HL although their specs are similar doesn't mean they play the same ...
there is no such thing as a better racket what is better for you might not be better for others ... what is the best for you might not be any good for others ... there's only a more suitable one for you thus become the better one for you but not the best for all ...
Jump-smash.. I understand about there is no such thing as best racket asking which one is better, NS9900 or VT80 might be wrong because it is different spec however, both rackets (BS12 and SW37) have similar spec, only different in technology that is why I asked the question is it sword technology that claimed by Victor can cut through air easily makes BS12 faster than SW37? is it e-titanium in SW37 that claimed by Victor can increase smashing power makes SW37 more powerful than BS12?
well it depends on your preferences, needs and play style only you could decide which one is better for you seems like you already know what they are good for BS12 good for speed and SW37 good for power it's your call ...
between SW35 and SW37 definitely SW35 is a lot head heavier than SW37 (297 mm > 287 mm) and SW35 is way stiffer too
Heyyy first post ever So... I'm really interested in this racket, are there any more people who have tried this racket and can share their views? Is it really comparable to SW35 or AT900? Thanks