Yup. Is slightly less stiffer than MX London.Shall confirm tonight after game with it.Dry swing i say is little slower than MX80 but will know more after tonight.
London and MX80 are more stiff compare to JJS for sure. Try continously hit 100 times for your back hand with London, sure get pain for normal player.
Yup, it does play more comfortable than MX London with my current state. Shall see with more game time, as for now MX JJS feels good ~ here are my musketeers
I used the MX JJS for a full session today and I must say that it is simply perfect. It was so good and matched my play so well that I only used the MX80 for 5minutes for comparison reasons. My thoughts; the racket is definitely less stiff than the MX80 but more so than the MX70. It was very comfortable during play and the power came easier than the MX80. However, the JJS is not as crisp as the MX80 but it still feels very solid and connected. Smashes were outstanding. Nothing else to say really. The extra head heaviness does it's part. I felt no difference in defensive capabilities. After a year of searching, I have finally found the perfect replacement for my MX80. The MX JJS.
Hello guys, CH coded JJS - http://www.badmintonmy.com/thread-11052-1-1.html The boss is selling this unit, 4U, anyone interested also can PM him. More info if anyone want to compare colors. p/s: Due to color defects already got back my 10 rackets returns with cash and they promised to have better service for the next times.
thx loneboy62 ...may i know what is the difference between CN and CH? i thought CH comes from China too, am i wrong? is that difference only on paint quality? *i've seen ur post on previous pages... i hope it will only differ in paint quality, not the performance
Victor China Coded is called CNF, so no CH or CN. No worry, according to my supplier, it is the same quality. I personally only tried first batch and the quality is same for me, as I can't feel the difference.
yes, i mean CNF. fiiuuh ... ur post sounds like a 'relief' for me, had a little bit worry when i read about the CNF coded on previous pages..haha , thx loneboy62.
sharp eyes there bro i dun hav any measuring equipment to tell but from the look it is thicker than both MX 80 and JJS
comparing to mx london can anyone with mx jjs and mx london give a review about how this two differ and which is better to play with ?
personally they play pretty much the same except for the level of stiffness JJS is more forgiving and somehow i felt the swing speed is slightly faster than London hope others can give more in depth review between these rackets too
im quite keen on getting a mx london , but mx jjs came across . is it true that mx jjs is slower in terms of defensive play ? and does the mx london swings faster than mx jjs?
