I want to increase my speed in my MD games Any advise..nano ray don't seem helping with it's wide body swing
the 9000X is better only if you think the 9900 is not stiff enough for you, the 9000x possibly a bit better in smashing (coz the shaft is stiffer) I currently own a pair of 9900, I really liked it, suits very well with my hand. The swinging speed is good, feel very comfortable in net shots and pushes The weakness about 9900 is the smashing isnt as solid and it demands a lot from your wrist.
Agreed. One can compensate for the solid smashing by having sore wrist. The type X has thicker frame/shaft and is less aerodynamic in shape compared to NS9900. NS9000X felt easier on the wrist compared to NS9900.
bro, so u confirm ns9900 has slimmest frame and shaft to ns9000 s/x ? therefore better aerodynamic so do u mean stiffness level : ns9000x >ns9900 >ns9000s ? therefore ns9000x more power in smash? any comment on ns9000s as i heard its much easier to usage..
Sorry, I cant confirm with you about the frame, I dont know the difference among them, maybe ask badmintan? In my opinion, yes. 9000x > 9900 > 9000s 9000s for me, is a racket for defending. I used my fd's once, it gave me a very good feeling in swinging and speed.
bro, so u confirm ns9900 has slimmest frame and shaft to ns9000 s/x ? therefore better aerodynamic any review on ns9000s n ns9000x?
The NS9900 has a slimmer frame and shaft than both NS9000 s/x, that is for sure. There you go. But read independent reviewers like Paul Stewart or Ants as well to get the best picture. 9000x and 9900 http://badmintan.blogspot.com/2011/06/yonex-nanospeed-9000x-review_18.html http://badmintan.blogspot.com/2009/03/yonex-nanospeed-9900-review.html
I thought I just saw stock of the NS9000 S/X in the SP market? If it is still available and placed in the same category as the NS9900 then why is it so difficult for yurimaster2010 to compare the dimensions of the said racquets himself, especially if he can physically do it himself? Frankly speaking, the difference is not exactly microscopic
for me, my dream of fastest racket will be ns9900 design but using z-slash super slim frame...this will speed up your every shots on the court
The NS9900's frame is already pretty slim, and in comparison to the Z-Slash the NS9900's frame is only about a minuscule 0.5mm thinner/slimmer in width, which would not make much difference to ultimate racquet head swing speed. The main difference between Z-Slash and NS9900 is that the Z-Slash has a more flexible frame, allowing energy to be stored during initial shuttle impact and then repelled for a powerful and controllable shot while the NS9900 has a very repulsive frame making shuttles fly out almost as soon as it hits the string bed, allowing the player to have a quicker paced game. Both racquets are easy to swing through the air due to their slim frame design although the Z-Slash is less stiff than the NS9900.
so should get ns9000s or stick with my existing ns9900? anything tat ns9000s has n other racket dont?
Hi there, I've recently purchased this racket and it should be arriving tomorrow. So excited!! After reading reviews and hands on experience, I've heard a lot of comments regarding the super stiffness. Like your shoulder and elbows becoming sore for example. How can I reduce/prevent this problem? And is this a major issue? Thanks in advance.
I don't have any shoulder, elbow or whatsoever sores. The very first time i used NS9900, the experience & feedback is just lovely..
