Armortec 900 Technique or Armortec 700? Does the Armortec 900 Technique have more power or less than the Amortec 700? What's the difference between control, power, and feel between the two rackets. If someone can give me some info before purchasing one that would be great. Thanks!
Simple. If you want a well rounded racket that's very forgiving yet still has that head heavy punch, that is as good in doubles as it is singles, get the 900T. If you're a singles orientated power-layer, or particularly strong, get the 700. Or something like that. No wait, just get the better looking one.
well said tiger. in player terms, if you like Lin Dan's style of play choose the AT700, if you life Taufik's style go with the AT900T.
How was your experience with the Armortec 900 Technique? Can anyone give me some information about the AT900T? How did it felt in terms of control, power, defense, and etc? Was it good at the net, smashing, clears and backhands? Head heavy or head light? I'm planning to get this racket but I want to know a little about it before I happen to purchase it. Thank you all!
Okay, because I love repeating info that's already available..... The AT900T is a great racket if you like head heavy rackets. If you don't, you're better of with an ArcSaber or Nanospeed. Probably the weirdest part I find about it, is that it feels slower than an even balanced racket, until you find yourself pulling off some outrageous returns and net shots. I also like the forgiving nature of the racket, especially when you're playing like a gimp or are a bit tired. It's got a big sweetspot which means you don't have to be a pro to get good shots out of it. I think it's one of the best all-rounder head-heavy rackets, and it doesn't hurt that it looks sharp either. Get the 900T if you delight in winning a point through out manoeuvering your opponents, get the 900P if you can't help but smash anything that goes over your head
The shaft is stiff but that's only one part of the rebound equation. As long as you don't string it too high, you'll be fine.
Is AT900T to much of the racket for a player which is not so strong in arm and wrist? Is it a racket which is hard to handle? I'm not a pro and am I not a beginner.
I bought a Armortec 900 technique again !!! I used to have one but I sold it when I bought my nanospeed 9900 then the other day I bought another one !! I used to love the AT900 technique before I bought my ns9900 but now I don't like it anymore it doesn't seem like the same racket I sold I used to feel that it had tons of power but now it doesn't seem to have the power it used to have . Also it feels not very durable in comparison to my ns9900. I do think the problem is the strings the tension is too low I will get it re strung soon and see what the difference is
don't think so, as mentioned again and again here, the racket is quite an easy to use and forgiving racket.
It means that you do not have to be Lin dan or taufik to use it and have amazing technique Basically it doesn't matter what your ability is it is a great racket in anyones hands
That is what I wanted to know. Because it is a pro racket for me logical explanation would be that racket is to much for average player to handle it. Some says get AT600 because it is less stiff or get ArcSaber 7. How about ArcSaber 7 compare to AT900T or Z slash compare to AT900T? I also like Victor BS09, 11 or SW36 which looks less stiff but BS 11 and SW32 are now available just with G2 grip which is to small for me. Regards
