|
|||||||
| Equipment Discussion on badminton equipment, including reviews, etc.
Sub Forums: Broken Rackets, Identify Fake Rackets |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HK
Posts: 92
|
Hi,
I have the Yonex Armortec 800 4U/G4 for about 6 months.. the racket is still performing, but will you get the NanoSpeed 8000 over it? Actually is NS8000 better for single or double? and talking about smashing and control, which one will perform better? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malaysia/Singapore
Posts: 206
|
I do not know as yet, but i Have a 4U/G4 A800OF, and i will be buying a Nanospeed 8000 on tuesday, i will give you feedback after using the rackets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Midwest, US and York, UK
Posts: 155
|
I've tried both NS8000 and AT800 DE and OF, and since I have a preference towards the Slim 10, I would have to go with the NS8000. I play both singles and doubles using the Slim 10, although it is more for singles.
For doubles, I would still prefer the AT800 because they are able to generate more power all things being equal, and as of now, I'm going to say they're more durable until someone can prove that the NS8000 is durable as well (Slim 10s are always breaking on me). Smashing will definitely be better on the AT800s but for control, that all depends on how you like your rackets, i.e. head heavy, head light etc. For control, I'd definitely prefer the NS8000, although the AT800 DE is quite close behind. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Malaysian Global Citizen
Posts: 12,051
|
For singles i would go for NS8000. But for Doubles , AT800 OF is still my preferred choice.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sydney and JKT
Posts: 288
|
just got my NS8k today, so won't comment on that, but for doubles id prefer AT800DE, xcellent control & pretty good power (im the controller, not smasher).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HK
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HK
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
currently i am using BG80@23lb |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 688
|
According to this chart..
NS8k should have the same or more smashing power as the AT800 I don't think you'll go wrong with buying NS8k |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Montreal (514)
Posts: 1,225
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada, BC, Vancouver
Posts: 91
|
I choose NEITHER hehe just because i rather use my cab 21 when i can go through four of there rather then one nano......... hrm...
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
I don't think this chart in anyway says that the higher you are up on the chart the more power you have. Yonex has officially stated in black and white that the NS8K (power rating 4) has less power than the AT800s AT700, MP99, MP100, MP88 and MP77, and NS7K (power ratings all 5). ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Richmond Hill
Posts: 688
|
...I wasn't aware of that sorry. Taneepak, can you tell me where I can find this information? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: HK
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
This time NS8K is at top too. and now it move a little to the right. means it is better in single. I don't know if i switch from 4U to 3U will give me more power in smahsing.?!?!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 678
|
Quote:
NS8000 is supposed to be more superior than NS7000. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,638
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 613
|
can you post this
. Its easy to claim but without proof i dont believe you. And if its true i would say its a trick to sell their stuff. Have tried both mp 100, 99 and 88 and 88 is no near as powerful as the other. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malaysia/Singapore
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
But Back to the topic, i have an 800 OF and now a 8000. I think that the 8000 is a better racket. The Smashing power is incredible, the shots are crisp and the feel is amazing (once you get your timing correct). You wont regret buying it. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NS7000 vs NS8000 | Fusion_M8 | Racket Recommendation / Comparison | 29 | 06-07-2005 12:27 AM |
| NS8000 available in Thailand? | armortec800 | Market Place | 7 | 04-19-2005 01:09 PM |
| NS8000 picture! | ASD | Equipment | 7 | 03-18-2005 12:47 AM |
| Further proof NS8000 is in the pipeline | armortec800 | Equipment | 8 | 03-01-2005 08:04 AM |