|
|||||||
| Equipment Discussion on badminton equipment, including reviews, etc.
Sub Forums: Broken Rackets, Identify Fake Rackets |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: toronto, canada
Posts: 334
|
Hey guys, Im thnking about getting one of those two, I just want to know which one is more worth the price...What are the main differences.. how much is 800 bettr than its predecessor by? Whcih one do you recommend..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 135
|
At800 comes in 2 flavors. DF and OF. They are both good if they suit you. Read the reviews and do a test drive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: toronto, canada
Posts: 334
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 972
|
Quote:
Personally, I don't like the Armortec 500 very much. It's really head-heavy and produces a really heavy weight overall. I find that other racquets which aren't head-heavy produce equal, if not more (depending on the player) power. So I don't find it much of a defense racquet or overall a good racquet to recover from when on the offense. So I'd go with the Armortec 800 OF or DE, doesn't really matter. I prefer DE because it's more balanced and quite frankly, I don't like head-heavy racquets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto/Richmond Hill
Posts: 192
|
I wouldn't consider AT800 "better" than AT500, even though there's a big price difference. They're simply 2 different racquets. I've played with both AT500 and AT800DF (both 3U) quite extensively. In my opinion, AT800DF is a faster and lighter than AT500. However, AT500 has more power and more vibration dampening, and slightly bigger sweet spot. One thing I perticularly find a problem with the AT800 is the different stringing pattern. This string pattern creates a longer section at top string bed where there is only main strings. hitting bird here increases chance of breaking strings very significantly. Thus you'd break a LOT more strings with a AT800. That is the main reason why I sold my AT800 and bought a AT500.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver B.C
Posts: 130
|
i own a at500 and i dun agree with the point of at500 being REALLY head heavy, infact its so light it feels balanced, also the at500 is a very nice racquet, because of the fact that its cheaper so basically id rate the at500 8.5/10 and the at800of/de 8.9/10 or so but the price is greatly diverse. IMHO at500 is the better bang for your buck
Btw this isn't a biased opinion i demoed both racquets before i finally settled on the at500 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beijing, China (nederlander
Posts: 48
|
i agree that at500 is a good all round racquet, but if you want to compare it to at800, then you should tell your level and playing-style first...
because at800 is now my favorite, but if your intermediate player i recommend you taking the at500. although i'm sure that both 'flavours' are better than the 500, it just doesn't feel right ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 474
|
Have to disagree with the last post. The AT800 Defensive is a lot easier for intermediates to use because it is head light.
The AT500 and the AT800 OF are favoured by stronger competitive players. Of course, you always have a few advanced players who have a totally defensive game and have to have a head light racket, but not many. Just look at the what the pros use, almost all of them use head heavy rackets(some of the women doubles players use AT800 DE but I don't think the men do). |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 441
|
Quote:
The AT-800 OF and DE are in fact quite similar. Both are head heavy, stiff and of a similar construction and weight. The DE is slightly more flexible. The AT-500 is technically a more defensive racquet than the 800 DE. A few advanced players using a head light? Many players are using the Nanospeed series racquets from Yonex. Chen Hong uses NS8000, for example and he is regarded to be one of the most attacking players around. Nano speeds are head-light but very offensive racquets. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Beijing, China (nederlander
Posts: 48
|
Quote:
you cant just say that womans play with a defensive racquet and the men dont. the main difference between the racquets is just the one that suits you better, no matter how expensive or cheap... i do agree that the DE is the best all round racquet, but legendarycroc: simple suggestion: if you are an attacking player with advanced level, take the OF. intermediate with attacking style, take the DE. defensive player advanced, take the DE, defensive player intermediate, take the 500. the price difference you probably know, the rest is up to you... Last edited by Slammer : 10-21-2005 at 07:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|