|
|||||||
| Equipment Discussion on badminton equipment, including reviews, etc.
Sub Forums: Broken Rackets, Identify Fake Rackets |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hong Kong S.A.R. China
Posts: 1,916
|
guys,
instead of yonex, carltron..... sort of big brands. any other small brands that u guys had tried which's in good value,performance and durability? plz list them. thx red |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Belgium
Posts: 343
|
Forza
I have 2 of their rackets, decent stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Singapore, Potong Pasir
Posts: 89
|
Try Pro Ace rackets..they are rather good...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London area, UK
Posts: 3,178
|
Karakal, the only choice if you want a REALLY light racket
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Vermont, USA
Posts: 629
|
Black Knight, of course! though... i admit to have recently acquired a nanospeed 8000... and it's pretty sweet. i'd recommend winex too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 462
|
SOTX, all the way!
Incidentally, Gollum, I own a Karakal SL-70, and I personally hated it. I tried to like it, really i did, played with it for a few weeks, but I couldn't bring myself to appreciating it-- I just don't find that the impact feeling is all that good, the racket feels "hollow". For my store, I've discontinued carrying them, as there are other rackets that are just as light but have a better impact feeling and are more affordable. Not that Karakal doesn't doesn't make some great products-- their grips for example, nothing compares ... but I feel that the high end karakal's are overpriced for the value you get for them, compared to other underdog brands. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London area, UK
Posts: 3,178
|
Well, I never said I liked the racket
I used to like it, but then it started to annoy me - it seemed unstable somehow on hitting, and under-powered. My At800-DE is so much better.But if you absolutely positively MUST have the lightest racket in the world, there's no alternative. Last edited by Gollum : 06-09-2005 at 07:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 462
|
Lol, sorry for misunderstanding. But that instability you refer to is what i mean by the "hollow feeling", I agree totally. It's that same instability that seems to plague most of the high end Karakals actually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 116
|
RSL makes wonderful & budget friendly rackets!
Last edited by ToMitch : 06-09-2005 at 09:20 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Philippines
Posts: 25
|
Someone in the forum is saying very good things about La Fleche. Haven't tried it though because the person selling it in the Philippines is in another island and there is no place near where I live I can try it. It is readily availble in HK and China.
Saw some Talbot and Babolat at the sporting goods store the other day, feels good and very wallet friendly! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 37
|
I have heard a lot about SOTX, but they seem expensive! What do you like about them?
Also, what would you recommend in the Karakal's weight class rackets? Thanks. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 289
|
Ok, Hi-Qua. Not advertising for myself or for Hi-Qua, but to answer the question of this thread and giving my honest opinion, Hi-Qua do make a few models that have excellent performance vs price.
I used HQ-909 since 1995 and broke it in 2003 during a smash. HQ-909 plays pretty much like a YY Cab 21 (which I also broke). That was the best racquet I've ever tried for singles at that time, though I also owned YY Cab 20 Tour. Since then I've tried out many different Hi-Qua models and the ones that really impressed me were PRO 3800 & HQ-800. The PRO 3800 (as it is called for the Asia & Europe market) has normal shaft length compared to the American version HQ-3800 PRO (Long Shaft), otherwise all specs are the same. The racquet is pretty light, but gives you very solid feeling when you hit a shot. Excellent control and stability, no hollow feeling. The one I tried was strung to 24lbs with BG-65. HQ-800 is a classic all carbon racquet. Cheaper than PRO racquets but also give a very good control and overall performance. It does lack a little power when you smash, but it's a very well-balanced and user-friendly racquet, I just picked it up and get used to using it no problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Hong Kong S.A.R. China
Posts: 1,916
|
lots of players in my badminton club are using shinny rackets! in fact the rackets were all cloned from yonex racket.no matter the color, model name, everything except the cap and the cone which was printed their brand shinny instead of yonex.
i'd tried one of the shinny at800 de clone. not bad! some of my friends even claimed that the performance is just as good as the real thing! besides, it's only $200 something hk dollars! that's pretty attractive! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 5,638
|
For very light racquets, like those in the lower weight range of 4U or below 4U, you can compensate the lack of power with very high tension, up to a point. I have a 83g racquet (racquet and string) which was a little lacking in power, but I have since strung it to 28.5/31 lbs and I did manage to squeeze a little extra power from it. Light racquets and low tensions do not make a good combination. The champions of old used 17lbs tension on 125g racquets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Quezon City, Philippines
Posts: 116
|
Quote:
Last edited by ToMitch : 06-10-2005 at 03:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,236
|
black knight, forza, karakal, hi qua, all very good.
some how i would classify black knight as mainstream though, since it's canada's most prominant brand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Regular Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London area, UK
Posts: 3,178
|
Quote:
![]() There are now plenty of competitors too. Decreasing quality of Karakal + more alternatives = buy alternatives |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| string tensions... main and across? | john | Stringing Techniques & Tools | 4 | 01-13-2009 11:53 AM |
| UK BBC interactive schedule | Neil Nicholls | Olympics ATHENS 2004 | 27 | 08-17-2004 04:15 AM |
| Tension difference in Main & Cross | atj_w | Equipment | 1 | 02-16-2003 09:32 PM |
| main & cross . confused | angelus_2012 | Equipment | 4 | 01-24-2003 12:38 PM |
| different tesion on main and cross ,it help something or not? | BangkokPlayer | Equipment | 5 | 03-15-2002 11:55 AM |