Victor Super Waves 35

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by chungjun, Oct 2, 2009.

  1. johnnxiv

    johnnxiv New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Your job
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    wow, I played with Z force before, very stiff,

    is Sw35 similar to Z force?
     
  2. Ferrerkiko

    Ferrerkiko Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    45
    Occupation:
    audit assistant
    Location:
    Singapore
    SW 35 stiffer and head heavier than z force
     
  3. johnnxiv

    johnnxiv New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2011
    Messages:
    189
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Your job
    Location:
    Miami, FL
    +

    how about the weight on both 4u version?

    Which one is better?
     
  4. atypical

    atypical Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2013
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Systems Analyst
    Location:
    Singapore
    Are you sure?
     
  5. Ferrerkiko

    Ferrerkiko Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    45
    Occupation:
    audit assistant
    Location:
    Singapore
    Ya i sure, 4U i not sure, for 3U i know superwave 35 is the stiffest and head heaviest.

    MX 80 will be 2rd or on par with Z force.
     
  6. Lemollin

    Lemollin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    60
    Location:
    Malaysia
    No, SW35 is not as head heavy as VTZF & not as stiff as MX80.

    MX80 is the stiffest racket in Victor CMIIW, and the stiffness of SW35 would be on par with VTZF but MX80 is stiffer than both of it.
     
  7. Ferrerkiko

    Ferrerkiko Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2008
    Messages:
    3,530
    Likes Received:
    45
    Occupation:
    audit assistant
    Location:
    Singapore
    So bro , u must be fan of MX 80
     
  8. Ch1k0

    Ch1k0 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    Occupation:
    N/A
    Location:
    Singapore
    Having tried all 3 rackets I concur that the SW 35 is definitely not as stiff as the MX 80 neither is it as head heavy as the Z Force.

    But if you really want extra stiff and head heavy in victor's line up of rackets I would suggest you actually take a look at the Artery Tec Ti-99 Classic.
     
  9. Lemollin

    Lemollin Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2012
    Messages:
    285
    Likes Received:
    60
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Lol, the point is not being a fan of the racket or not, that is just my opinion and how i felt about all the 3 rackets mentioned from above.
     
  10. quixilver

    quixilver Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    425
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Jakarta/Singapore/Sydney
    Wow... I didn't know this, you are truly an expert :D
     
  11. NeverWalkAlone

    NeverWalkAlone Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Malaysia
    I know it's an old thread but this racket has really been a dilemma for me. Tried and tried adjusting to it, but sw35 never clicked for me (owned it for two years).

    I'd have to entirely change my swing technique and timing when using sw35. It also felt cumbersome when playing doubles.

    The one i am using is 3u btw. If there was a 4u, i am 100% sure that would make a whole LOT of difference. Fyi my go to rackets are bs10 and mx80 for doubles and v80 and f9 for singles.
     
  12. concretemad

    concretemad Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    engineer
    Location:
    puchong, malaysia
    imo, this thingy is a very demanding, if not the most. I own a 3u as well. Even compare to the ATs (700,800of and 900p, all 3u), it was heaviest, head heaviest and stiffest. So, what else.....to expect from it.
     
  13. ucantseeme

    ucantseeme Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,075
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Occupation:
    Z-Force II
    Location:
    Z-ForceII
    Can't agree. Stiffness maybe, didn't hold any AT in my hands since a few years, but could be true. Heavy? MY 3U's are 85 and 86 dry without plastic. I had a few grams heavier AT in the past. Around 90g dry without plastic. Head heavy? My are around 43-44g swing weight wet. My AT was around 47-48g. Maybe we get very different rackets due bad QC, but I think that it's a myth that the SW35 was the extreme stiff stick which was really heavy and head heavy. Can't speak for anything special like KRP. But if you played a FZ TI-550VS you know what demanding is.
     
  14. teoky

    teoky Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Singapore
    I agree with you. SW35 is definitely not the stiffest or head heaviest racquet out there. The wet bp of my two SW35s are 285mm and 295mm (both with towel grip). Nothing compared with the wet bp of my AT700 Limited which is more than 300mm even with an overgrip over the original grip.

    The most demanding racquet I ever tried was the Carlton Vapour Trail Elite. It felt like a wooden plank instead of a racquet.
     
  15. NeverWalkAlone

    NeverWalkAlone Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Malaysia
    SW35 should be even balanced. So your bp of 285mm and 295mm should be correct.

    I have played with AT700. It was really nice head heavy racket to play with. Lotsa power and the light frame tech compensate for the heavy head somewhat.

    The E Titanium frame and square shape on the head and short shaft on SW35 (compare to bs10, f9 and v80) was the sticky thing for me. It was difficult to produce the same swing speed as in other rackets due to overall design of sw35.
     
  16. concretemad

    concretemad Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2009
    Messages:
    542
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    engineer
    Location:
    puchong, malaysia
    definately stiffer than all ATs. I have lower 3u at800of and at900p. The sw35 is very close to my at700 in wt. i will recheck its balance against the ATs. For record, shoulder aching the most from this sw35 than anything else in my possession including mx80.
     
  17. Sundis

    Sundis Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    3,921
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Occupation:
    Watching and playing badminton
    Location:
    at home
  18. Ch1k0

    Ch1k0 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2012
    Messages:
    5,754
    Likes Received:
    1,353
    Occupation:
    N/A
    Location:
    Singapore
    Tbh it can still be found without much searching. The racket generally just doesn't move anymore now because everyone is wise to the fact that the beast is hard to tame.
     
  19. Sundis

    Sundis Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    3,921
    Likes Received:
    1,134
    Occupation:
    Watching and playing badminton
    Location:
    at home
    I have heard many people saying that this was out of stock forever in Europe and the last time I checked (about 2 months ago) this shop did not have it listed.
     
  20. NeverWalkAlone

    NeverWalkAlone Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2011
    Messages:
    250
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Does Sw35 hv a 4u version?

    I really can't believe jung jae sung used a 3u for doubles.
     

Share This Page