I currently use a AT900T with NBG 95 supposedly at 27 pounds, and a Arc10 with BG 65 supposedly at 27 pounds. I'd say i'm a advance-intermediate player with good wrist power (not good enough to effectively backhand smash). I feel that my Arc10 has more power than my AT900, with both strings strung at the same tension, and the NBG 95 being more advanced, does anybody know why?
I have 3 AT900T all with different strings and different tension lol (not on purpose), through experience, BG68Ti was a great string to use at most tension ranges, it gave lots of replusion, smashes felt great on impact with a great sound, clears were effortless. I have strung with NBG 95 before but it felt much more dead and less satisfying, specially in the sound department. Next time try stringing with BG68Ti and see what you think, I string that one onto my racket mostly but just now ive changed to Kason P 75 to see how that string feels, Ive posted a review have a look back tonight when i update it haha!
ok ty, my nanospeed 9000 has 68 ti. I'm neutral about it. i heard nbg95 was more durable version of bg 80?
it is different that BG80. BG 80 uses vectran, while NBG 95 uses nanocarbon fibers. read Dinkalots review for a better idea
