I also love the Ti-10. I have 4, ready for it???..... One 2nd gen (3UG5), which i think is very very slightly more head light than..... my.... Three 1st gen, one UK model (direct from Yonex HQ in London) (3UG3) and two SP models (3UG5). I have tried an Arc 10, nano 9k S, but i still prefer my Ti-10. The Arc 10 seemed really nice, but i would need to try it restrung to my method at 26lbs to tell properly. It's the racket i know I can count on when i'm not 100% (ti-10), even at 26lbs BG65Ti. But when i'm seeing the shuttle well, and have a spring in my step, it is awesome.
Sure Sure. 50% from Licin and 50% from yonexman. Thanks for the co-sponsorships of my Ti-10 3rd gen. Will send both of you my Beijing address. I have been a good boy. Please send me my Christmas present ya.
i feel that comparing ti-10 to nanospeed 9900, nanospeed 9900 is better in term of stiffness and head heavy.
i have 4 3rd gen (2 2UG4 and 2 3UG4). i agreed with review in the previous post that this racket suits for doubles. in term of manouverablity of 3U excels (maybe i dont have such a strong wrist). i tried this racket (2U) for singles and i observed that i got less feel for sliced drop as most of my shot were out and my clears got out too! personally i like all around rackets (good enough for singles and doubles) as cab30 (i have 4 pcs 3U4G). i have a plan to sell my 2 ti10s (2U and 3U both in mint condition).
