Currently looking for a attacking racket but i am in the state of confusion which to get so i am now asking for advice from BC'ers who have experience with these 3 rackets and make comparisions between them. I am more inclined to attacking, drops and clears must be effective. Would appreciate all the valuable advice. YL
the only thing i can tell between my n90 and my n50 is that the n90 is a bit head heavier...that's it. and to me, they are both heavy. i don't have the victor racket so i can't comment on it.
I have both the JJS and N90... I prefer the N90 because I find that even though the N90 is heavy... It feels more balanced. JJS feels more head heavy and I can't get used to the flex characteristic of the JJS... N90 in my bag JJS keep for show
It depends if you play more singles or doubles. If you play mostly singles get N90 (the racket with the most control and power but lacks of speed) . If you play both doubles and singles get the N50 or the MX JJS(do not know this racket). Cause the N90 has a slow swing speed so its hard to use in fast doubles.
Well I don't know what else you need to know besides it's LIN DAN's RACKET!!! HAHAHA!!! I really don't know what you want to know... You need to ask specific questions before I can give you more details...
N50 was Fu Haifeng's racquet as well. In fact, I'm looking for the red N50 online but can't seem to find it, anyone has an idea where to buy it? MBS is out of stock
yeah,i think so,JJS feels more head heavy and I can't get used to the flex characteristic of the JJS.