What do you guys think of such racket? do you think this type of racket favors attacking play more? i.e. smashing and drives or defensive play? i.e. lifting, flat clear, defence Thanks Chris just an update: racket is relatively stiff. Stiffness = VTZF balance = Arc series
When I read "no air resistance" I thought the exact opposite of what it me t and my brain broke. Wouldn't it depend on how you achieve such low air resistance anyway? You could make a super small head shape and it would be a powerhouse if you hit the strings.
no air resistance at all? so you're swinging a racket with no head and no strings? Or perhaps just a handle?
no such racket, unless you're just imagining you're swinging a racket but in reality you are no holding a racket. if the racket exists, then it has mass, so when you swing, it will have some kind of air resistence, no matter how small it is.
Just an update, i have compared it to a N90 II, the swing speed is faster than N90. feeling however, is almost identical. Sorry for the no air resistance thing. more like, it is nearly no air resistance. Note: The Racket is from Hi-Qua. Not something you can get your hands on without knowing a coach that sponsors this brand.
there could be air, just not a whole lot of gravitational pull, or just too little air that we would die? just wondering
