Well, this is interesting. According to the website which the OP posted, the A1 is head light... but at 88gms? That looks like a 2U Nanoray racket (Z-Speed)..... A2 kinda equal to a 3U VT80... maybe even VT70? As for A3, it seemed to equal a flexible version of the 4U Z-Force....
I think there is a mistake in the website. If you look at the A1 pictures, there is one showing that it is head heavy. At 301mm, I'm sure it is head heavy...
Despite being a fan of JJS, I have to agree that this is not a good investment for Dunlop imo. Fans buy products used by their idiols when they are used during their heyday, not when they've retired. I mean, what prestigous tournament has JJS won with the Dunlop racquet? None. How is that a good selling point? I mean just look at Zhao Jian Hua when he retired, how many people actually went out to buy the racquets he endorsed post retirement compared to the sales made on those racquets pre-retirement. Even today, many decades after ZJH retired, the Boron 2 he used still remains one of the most sought after racquets ever made.
currently using jjs a3 and i'd say it is a very comfortable racket and great maneuverability for drives and defense. It is a good racket for doubles.
saw the JJS A3 and it looks decent. to anyone who has tried it, how does it compare to other rackets from other brands? thanks.
