paying with plastics, sometimes with feathers(too expensive). i am having a 2u zstrike, vt80etune and tk8000. certainly i am having difficulty in getting adjusted but at no point i saw lack of control or anything inferior in plastics, its just some adjustment to speed and delivery of power, that what is different in plastics and feathers. I will still say go with duo10, it has the power and control. My personal opinion. but never zstrike or zspeed, they are too demanding on your shoulders. wont say anything about a 4u zf2. its a good buy, but its a 4u. wieldable, yet punishing! duo10 will still give you a smoother transition than a zf2, purely on ease of playability and power generation.
I would like to ask that does duo10 have power and easy to use because of dual optimum system or 4u zf2 is ok .which is more user friendly
The box + aero frame is not why D10 is easy to use. It's simply because it's not too stiff and it's quite even balanced. A lot of people will say that the two sides have no difference even though I can feel it. I would say between D10 and 4U zf2 the D10 will still be easier to use.
duo 10 has power, plenty of it. you'll feel it. also, i have duoZs 2u and i cant feel any difference between aero and box sides. well, it doesnt really bother me. i can extract some power from it as i am still getting used to it. also, if you want easier access to power alone, look at vt70etune in 3u, or a thruster k6000/k8000. honestly, i could extract more power from my tk8000 on account of ease of playability as compared to zf2 4u. don't just buy flagship for wow factor, it wont give you any!
read racket in terms of stiffness and balance, just dont look at rackets on basis of aero or box frame profiles. it wont matter much when you'll be wielding your racket expertly.
And power is not an inherent trait of a racket, that lies in the user. No racket is powerful if you can't handle it properly be it a lowly mp29 or 3u zf2. Also, have seen pros hitting 300+kmph smashes with a nr800/900. Rackets should be rated in terms of wieldability and ease of power access, which is exactly how stiffness and balance would come into play. Just my opinion.
better than zf2 and zstrike, for sure on basis of stiffness. stiff is what you can get used to with time, workouts and practise, extra stiff is what draws your energy and technique like crazy and exposes you to an injury(read-- shoulders)
you still sure high end racket is a means to your end? would really suggest going in for a pre-owned high end or a mid-ranger.
i am selling my victor thruster k8000 for 8000inr and its practically new and has gotten a step-treatment from me(i have ignored it the most and won with it the most as well) it will fullfill the need of yours to get a flagship as well. if you have to buy a new racket Apacs tantrum ashaway phantom x fire(tremndous value for money and specs) yonex vt10dg(is a rough version of zf2)
