APACS fan club

servemaster said:
I don't think hard hitter pro is in anyway similar to nano 1000z. The frame of nano 1000z is very wide and feels solid. This rumor has risen probably due to AI learning utter nonsense from social media where people say anything they want. AI then tries to make it convincing to whoever searches about it.
Click to expand...
I agree with your opinion on AI 100%, but I didn’t ask if the NF1000Z and the Hard Hitter Pro are similar or comparable.
I had only asked someone to measure his frame head and let me know the results.
 
Din Lan said:
That’s strange.

On the first photo it looks like the NF 1000Z head is smaller, on the second photo the Hard Hitter Pro head looks smaller.
Click to expand...
NF1000 frame profile is very thick. Almost like 1.75x of other rackets. Also just because the heads are same doesn't mean they will play similar.
 
servemaster said:
NF1000 frame profile is very thick. Almost like 1.75x of other rackets. Also just because the heads are same doesn't mean they will play similar.
Click to expand...
I see myself that the NF1000Z frame is very thick, it’s not a secret. Approximately 1.75x as thick as other rackets I think is a rumor, show me a racket with a head thickness of ~7.3mm.
The NF800 (not Pro) has a very slim head thickness, but still measures ~9.5mm.

And once again I didn’t ask if the NF1000Z and the Hard Hitter Pro play similar or comparable.
I had only asked someone to measure his frame head and let me know the results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top