does it make sense to announce a new brand while still using the old one?That is far too late.......
p-e h.Do yo have source anyway?
does it make sense to announce a new brand while still using the old one?That is far too late.......
p-e h.Do yo have source anyway?
Firstly, I would expect it to be publish at least at mid December. There is no SS anymore at this time, only SSF.does it make sense to announce a new brand while still using the old one?
Will be adjusted and still on going to finalized the draft. Once it ready, they will publish.What are the ranking points for each level?
Yeah, currently 10, 5 PS and 5 SS out of the 7. Increasing the compulsory tournaments to 12 or 14 is unlikely to go down well with, esp the top 20 players who have to peak at the majors every year, both individual and team as well as regional championships such as quadrennial Asian Games, and perhaps the BAC as it rises in status.Mandatory 14 tournaments per year?
Currently it's 10, right?
Because tennis is less explosive compared to badminton? Tennis kinda requires more stamina, while badminton demands more on power explosion in a match. That certainly plays a role in how the calender competition actually is designed. Taking into consideration on peaking frequency, duration to reach peak, length of time to performing at the peak, etc.. This basically translates into how the tournaments seen by players and national association. Also keep in mind how the team events operate differently between tennis and badminton. Fed, Hopman and Davis cup played in an entire year while TUC and SC are in a week. Certainly the way NA approach these cups in preparing their player's peaks are different than in tennis. I believe, player should not be forced to play in more than 10 SS in a year, preferably only 8 actually. That already leads to about 13 tournaments in a year after including SC or TUC, WC / OG, continental championship, SSF (for some) and some other national / regional championships (for some).On the other hand, tennis has a lot more compulsory tournaments, so I don't know why badminton should hold back.
Yeah 10 is okay. Then it adds up to be about 15 overall after adding the other tournamentsYou need 10 ranking tournaments though. Players should definitely be encouraged to play at least 10. 10 isn't even once a month.
On the other hand, tennis has a lot more compulsory tournaments, so I don't know why badminton should hold back.
1.08 Reduction of ATP World Tour Masters 1000 Commitment
A. A player’s number of ATP World Tour Masters 1000 commitment tournaments shall be reduced by one (1) tournament for reaching each of the following milestones:
1) 600 matches (as of 1 January of the commitment year);
2) 12 years of service;
3) 31 years of age (as of 1 January of the commitment year).
If all three (3) conditions are met then the player has a complete exemption from the ATP World Tour Masters 1000 player commitment.
B. A player who is eligible for a reduction of his ATP World Tour Masters 1000 commitment tournaments must be in good standing with the ATP in order to receive a reduction of required ATP World Tour Masters 1000 commitment tournaments.
The final version is always available here: http://bwfcorporate.com/events/calendar/2018/Hi! This information is very important for me! I enjoy and fond of browsing your website! Is the calendar complete? Or, must it be changed?