DinkALot's Racket Review

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by DinkAlot, Jun 29, 2007.

  1. Easy Tiger

    Easy Tiger Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Australia
    Hey Pandaboy, where's the NS9900 review and rating?
     
  2. jymbalaya

    jymbalaya Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2007
    Messages:
    977
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    United States
    if you read it, it says pending.
    DinkALot does these reviews, and we should be happy just to get them. Give him time.
     
  3. Easy Tiger

    Easy Tiger Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Bum
    Location:
    Australia
    I know it's pending, I was just giving him ****, because I know he likes it so much. :D
     
  4. youthchean

    youthchean Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2009
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Malaysia
    Hi Dink, have you tried on the new Lethal 60 yet? waiting for your review =)
     
  5. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California

    Nope, about to test the following:

    APACS Lethal 15, 20, 25
    APACS Tantrum Power 120, 130, 150, 160
    APACS Nano Pro 8000, 8800, 9000 Tour
     
  6. ViningWolff

    ViningWolff Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2004
    Messages:
    849
    Likes Received:
    7
    Occupation:
    Process Engineer
    Location:
    Strathmore Alberta
    I found the lethal's to be REALLY flexible. Head heavy, which is good, but not a raquet for someone with a fast swing speed.
     
  7. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    The Lethal 50 would be the only one "stiff" enough for your preference, the others ones, not so much.
     
  8. neogenesus

    neogenesus Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    san francisco
    Can't believe Kason Carvel U3/U4 is in the BOLD category :cool:. It's very cheap, lightweight and flexible yet durable. A little bit tricky to use, especially for smashing.
     
  9. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    You need to read the chart more carefully. :)

    Each racket made is designed for a certain purpose; at least a predominant one. The Carvel U3/U4 is designed to be a lightweight, flexible, durable, defensive racket, at an excellent price. That's why it's in bold.

    The Carvel is an excellent defensive racket and if you look at the performance findings, they reflect that. It's not an attack oriented racket at all as backed by the performance findings. And not all attack oriented rackets are good either.

    It really depends what you are looking for in a racket.

    If you are a hard hitter or offense oriented, you should be looking at offensive/attack rackets, not defensive ones.

    I hope this clarifies why the Carvel is a highly recommended racket and why something as powerful and solid as a SOTX Woven 11 is not highly recommended.
     
  10. noluckjim

    noluckjim Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Messages:
    142
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    New Zealand
    I'd be interested in seeing how the Panda Power racquets compare too :)
     
  11. justinwyyau

    justinwyyau Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    8
    Occupation:
    Husband and Dad
    Location:
    Melbourne AU
    Hi DinkAlot,

    Congratulations on your Ultra and Trinity racquets. I am interested to hear your review/comments about the above APACS models. Just update us when you are able. Thanks DinkAlot.

    Justin
     
  12. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    I will not be reviewing the Panda Power rackets, I feel it will be a conflict of interest. :p
     
  13. Stiff_Racket

    Stiff_Racket New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Melbourne
    APACS Nano PRO 9600 Tour

    I just bought an APACS Nano Pro 9600 Tour, paid AU$120 for it (Racket + String + Freight). It is 3U/G2 (equivalent to YY G4) with YY BG-80 string @ 24-main/26-cross lbs, Wilson Pro Over Grip on top of the original grip. I have only used YY rackets for the past 20+ years (Cab-20, Boron-2, Cab-25, MP-100, MP-Limited, AT-900P & T, NS-8000). I play mostly doubles. Having had about 4 hours worth of court time with APACS NP9600T, I'd like to post my opinion/feel of the racket. In terms of feel, it is more flexible than ALL the above YY rackets. Don't get me wrong, it is not overly flexible, just a little more flexible. The racket feels balanced with just a hint of head heaviness. Swing speed is good but not as fast as YY 3U MP-100 & NS-8000 (in my hand). Racket feels stable. Control is fantastic. Power is good. More of a defensive racket than offensive. In terms of price/performance/quality equations - it is superb! I'm so impressed by the price/performance/quality equations, that I'm going to try another APACS. A stiffer one of course... the Armor Muscle Pro 95.
     
  14. neogenesus

    neogenesus Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    san francisco
    I know that Kason carvel U3/U4 is not a powerful nor attacking racket. It is very hard to generate enough power to make it powerful. I am just surprised that you tried the Kason Carvel U3/U4. It is not popular, unheard of and even in the website, it is considered as a "recreational" racket. What I love about that racket is that it is so lightweight, it doesn't hurt my wrist so much and doesn't wear me down in a rally even after 8-10 games. And because it is so lightweight, you can generate the power to "whip" the racket from your arm and you will be surprised how much power this racket can generate. Good performance to price ratio racket in my opinion.
     
  15. jei28

    jei28 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2009
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    Thanks for all the effort dinkalot.

    Would you have some Li-Ning rackets to review?
     
  16. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    No, I don't plan to purchase any of the LN rackets. They are not readily available in the U.S. and too expensive abroad. :(
     
  17. Sakuragi80

    Sakuragi80 New Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    KL
    Wilson K-Tour Racquet

    Hi DinkALot,

    Have you play with Wilson K-Tour racquet before? Can you post a review on this? Thank you so much :)
     
  18. SilverDJ

    SilverDJ Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    111
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Consultant
    Location:
    WA, USA
    i wonder when the list will be updated with a review of the Zelm racket. *wink wink*.

    it's too bad you're such an honorable person and you aren't reviewing the panda power rackets. i have a feeling they'd be excellent+ across the board.
     
    #598 SilverDJ, Aug 22, 2009
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2009
  19. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    287
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California

    I need to have the powers that be update the list...I know, I'll talk to Oldhand. :)

    As for rating the Panda Power rackets, no way they are "Excellent+" across the board, not even close. If I were to "rate" the rackets (which I'm not), it would be something like this:

    Note: a change in the weight and BP could alter the ratings significantly.

    Panda Power Trinity, 86.5g, BP288
    Overall: Excellent-
    Ideal For: Doubles/Singles
    Play Style: All-Around
    Stiffness: Very Stiff -
    Balance: Moderate+
    Frame Feel: Good+
    Frame Stability: Good
    Racket Power: Good+
    Racket Defense: Excellent
    Frame Durability: Good+
    Paint Durability: Good-
    Shaft Durability: Excellent
    Comments: relatively durable, paint finish a bit soft, good balance, good all-around.

    Panda Power Ultra, 86.5g, BP290
    Overall: Excellent-
    Ideal For: Doubles/Singles
    Play Style: Attacking
    Stiffness: Very Stiff+
    Balance: Moderate+
    Frame Feel: Excellent-
    Frame Stability: Excellent
    Racket Power: Excellent or Average
    Racket Defense: Good
    Frame Durability: Excellent+
    Paint Durability: Good-
    Shaft Durability: Excellent+
    Comments: only powerful if you can flex the shaft otherwise it's just average performing. Extremely strong but thick frame and shaft. Paint is a bit soft. A true work horse.

    But, I'm not "rating" the rackets...so... :p:p
     
  20. IngvarC

    IngvarC Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2009
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Australia
    Have you or anyone else here tried APACS Lethal 60? I am wondering how it really compares to Lethal 50. I saw on the UK website that Lethal 70 is also double shaft so it seems like APACS has not given up on the double shaft for this line of rackets.
     

Share This Page