Taufik was the first one who claimed that he will win if he wants to. But it is NOT true since he has lost to Chen Jin and never won against him. So a guy claiming he will win if he wants to, must meet two criteria: 1) has won at least one tournament. This is easy 2) has beaten everyone whom he met. This is the real meaning he can win if he wants to. As long as there is one player out there, Taufik lost but never won, then he should not be qualified to say he can win, simply there is no proof at all. Taufik is NOT the guy who can win if he wants to, then who else are qualified? Lin Dan - Lin Dan won a lot of tournaments, and did he lost to anyone whom he never won? As far as I know, there is none. So Lin Dan could claim he will win if he wants to, even though you or we, don't believe that, but he can say that, because he has the proof to win, and the proof to beat everyone he has met. Chen Jin - Is this guy able to claim he's the one who will win if he wants to? I haven't checked all the records, he may be qualified too. I'm not good at rember head to head results, need to check Chen Hong - need to check Peter Gade - need to check Lee CW - need to check Bao CL - need to check Taufik - No! He lost to Chen Jin and never won Wong CH - No! he lost to Lin Dan and never won Could some experts here clarify these players' qualifications to be self-claimed he will win if he wants?