Yonex BG AeroBite

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by BengGuan, Jun 17, 2016.

  1. BengGuan

    BengGuan Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2009
    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Stringer
    Location:
    Indonesia
    It seems Yonex will be launched in short for Aero string series... AeroBite
     

    Attached Files:

    Saru, bdmntnlver, Sealman and 4 others like this.
  2. esppy

    esppy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2013
    Messages:
    1,662
    Likes Received:
    734
    Location:
    Singapore
    Yonex really liking hybrid concepts these days....
     
  3. decoy

    decoy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    96
    Location:
    Maritime canada
    My french isn't the best. But it seems like yonex is contradicting itself in the second image. First they say the strings straighten quickly after slicing. But then the image shows the strings bending dramatically and goes on to say that the strings have weak friction in general. I can't imagine strings selling well to the general public if they move around a whole bunch.
     
  4. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    430
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    This will sell shedloads because it's Yonex and because it's new (nobody will remember that Adidas were here three years ago:)), but even this promo stuff is misrepresenting the whole point of hybrid stringing: compromise.

    Any idea what the parent strings are?
     
  5. baddie9905

    baddie9905 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2015
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Sydney
    Theoretically, will the +1lb on crosses rule of thumb apply? Since presumably the thicker string on mains will have a higher tension loss.
     
  6. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    15,943
    Likes Received:
    1,600
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    My French is non existent. What does it say? That there's more friction or less? I assume more?

    Parent strings could be BG85 and AS.
     
  7. decoy

    decoy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    884
    Likes Received:
    96
    Location:
    Maritime canada
    The only mention of "friction" with an adjective defining it, translates to "weak". It's with the photo of the main string being way out of position as well.
     
  8. rick-aki

    rick-aki New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2016
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    japan
    Hi, I'm japanese.
    BG65 has not been sold in the Out of print.
    Main might be different kind of string .
     
  9. T.O.P

    T.O.P Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    137
    Location:
    SG
    0.67 + 0.61 gauge, 1 pack in 2 different gauge.
    actually we can just pair BG85[0.67] + Aerosonic[0.61] to try it out instead. :)
     
    takahira and KingLCW like this.
  10. KingLCW

    KingLCW Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2016
    Messages:
    51
    Likes Received:
    5
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Australia
    We can actually pair the thickness of the strings that we want wif the wide range of strings haha
    Gonna be a lot of combinations
     
    T.O.P likes this.
  11. T.O.P

    T.O.P Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2013
    Messages:
    680
    Likes Received:
    137
    Location:
    SG
    Haha. i would try bg80 + 65ti one day.o_O
     
  12. Charlie-SWUK

    Charlie-SWUK Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,415
    Likes Received:
    1,207
    Occupation:
    N90 sycophant
    Location:
    SW UK
    How typical of Yonex to market a new technology ideal that nobody in their right mind needs.
     
  13. FeatherBlaster

    FeatherBlaster Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Denmark
    I don't understand why so many users in here are so opposed to hybrid stringing?
    It make sense in so many ways.
    Durability, frequency/repulsion matching (long and short strings), etc.
    I guess that the only drawbacks are that it's more expensive to produce and distribute, and more cumbersome to "use".
     
  14. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,091
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    EU
    I tried almost a whole reel of the adidas hybrid stuff and I can tell you why I think hybrids don't really work.

    The 'thin' adidas string (0.69) really cuts into the thicker string (0.72) and most times the main strings were worn through by the thinner strings. The thin strings still looked brand new afterwards.

    If you have two equal strings biting into each other, the wear is spread between the two. Sadly the thinner string is also stiffer (for the adidas casem however I think thinner strings generally need to be stiffer than thick strings to handle the same tensions), this mis-match in stiffness (and/or hardness) almost guarantees all the abrasive wear occurs on the side of the less stiff/hard set of strings.

    In the end, I got more mileage out of using 0.69 for mains and crosses than using the hybrid combo
     
    gundamzaku and visor like this.
  15. FeatherBlaster

    FeatherBlaster Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Denmark
    Sounds a bit strange. I've experienced better durability after going thicker on the mains in a couple of tests. However I have never tried adidas strings, not as a player nor as a stringer..

    Perhaps the hybrid strings we have seen so far just simply haven't been good strings?

    Given that on same strings, you get the vast majority of cut on the mains, it should be possible to improve upon using hybrid.

    And given that you get better repulsion from mains than crosses, this should also be able to improve upon.

    Either in getting a better tradeoff from repulsion/durability on the overall string job - or by getting a better performing string job due to mainstream and crosses working better together.

    Look at it this way:

    In a given string job today, you could go a bit thinner on the crosses, getting better repulsion and bite from those, without sacrifying overall durability (because it is still the mains that break). However you must keep in mind that thinner crosses perhaps cut more on the mains as you mention. This however cannot be much.
    If you start at 66 mm you could perhaps go down 2 mm on crosses and up 1 mm on mains, end up with better performance and durability.

    Now I'm not talking mixing current strings, I'm talking strings that are designed to work together and yield same properties.
     
  16. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    6,869
    Likes Received:
    430
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Pick any two strings and there will one one lying in the middle, so just use that one.

    There's no need to hybrid in badminton, IMO.
     
  17. Charlie-SWUK

    Charlie-SWUK Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,415
    Likes Received:
    1,207
    Occupation:
    N90 sycophant
    Location:
    SW UK
    Yeah, this just seems like another Yonex desperation concept like the whole 'two sides to one frame' business - it's a solution to a problem nobody needed, wanted, or asked for; it's just there to create sales. Quite why they bothered doing this with string is a mystery in itself, most people seem to use Yonex string at the moment. It's only we few on here that are quite so pedantic about our strings.
     
  18. FeatherBlaster

    FeatherBlaster Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Denmark
    Well, I welcome development.

    Maybe it's a dead end, maybe it will be the next thing.

    The theoretical potential is there. At least, the engineer within me think so.

    I think it's better that they try, rather than lean back saying "everyone plays Yonex strings anyway, why bother".

    That approach would have robbed us of the BG-AS.

    And honestly, how many of you would have said: "It's just a marketing gimmick to make the thinnest string. No one will use it, since they already do the BG66UM". "Such a thin string doesn't make sense".
     
  19. FeatherBlaster

    FeatherBlaster Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Messages:
    926
    Likes Received:
    330
    Location:
    Denmark
    Anyone here who string tennis rackets? Isn't hybrid normal or at least an accepted concept in tennis?
     
    Saru, gundamzaku and amit008 like this.
  20. Charlie-SWUK

    Charlie-SWUK Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2014
    Messages:
    4,415
    Likes Received:
    1,207
    Occupation:
    N90 sycophant
    Location:
    SW UK
    I dunno @FeatherBlaster I preferred Li Ning No.1 to Aerosonic for power and control, so to me it did seem like a thin gimmick.
     

Share This Page