For Dink, using 28lbs. - 34lbs., ZM Fire had minimal problems with respect to string movement.
I played with the new ZM62F tonight and will compare it to NBG99, both at 30lbs....Quite frankly it was rubbish.
Control wise, it's too repulsive for control, especially at net play.
this kind of property reminds me of NBG98.
Yep, don't hit in the sweetspot if you want control and not too much bounce.Deliberate mis-hit takes all the bounce out for me when I want control. I think Cai Yun said he did this for serving (that repulsion is nice for flick serves)
^ Ummm... what happened? Why is it night and day difference with just a drop of 1 lb?
I have no idea why...
Dink thinks he knows why; it's all about what we are used to and the comparison begins there...
...once you get used to something, that's what you perceive to be the benchmark. If something new comes along and it's different, regardless whether it's good or bad, it's perceived bad because it's different from your original benchmark. It's not comfortable, it's new, it's different.
Once you get used to the new, it may or may not be better than your original benchmark but you are more accustomed to it. In this case, perhaps better.
Of course if the new string was less durable and less repulsive, then dismissing it would be prudent. In this case, initially the string was more repulsive but not favorably for you, not the way you are used to. But after getting more familiar with the string, it's now becoming more favorable...
...sound about right?![]()
Every hit was like a mini orgasmic experience!![]()
I guess that Zm62 is a 0.66 string but not real 0.62, but I don't have any instruments to verify my impression.