Try manipulating it such that it only shows the top 4-6 pairs (as he liked, to his discretion) and u will see that Jung/Lee still come up no 1, the undisputed WORLD DOMINATOR in MD! Hurray!
When that happens, I'm sure it'll be shown again too him how ridiculous his argument is. The poor boy is a slow learner though....got hammered all the time and still repeating the same old broken record..
Even Abedeng mentioned that Boemoe / is top 4 MD thats means the other 3 are CY/FHF,MK/HS and KKK/TBH...as I said...LYD/JJS is going down hill to number 5 or 6.. Nice work Badadum...We do not see LYD/JJS is on top of the world at last....
maybe bro ctdyn can do a very good stat for the md category http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77212
In my opinion, the best MD currently are: MK/HS, LYD/JJS & FHF/CY. I consider this 3 pairs as evenly matched.
It makes sense but not a proper measure "to the purpose of this thread". You should deeply think over, say, why there exist the tournaments like Super Series Masters Final. You can see such kind of Final Games in another sports such as Golf. As the facts show, MK/HS could win the title (the only exception is Olympic 2008) only when JJS/LYD did not participate in the same tournaments. Actually, they lost to JJS/LYD four times in a row since 2008. Please stick to the purpose of this thread. If you forget it, please read earlier posts. If you don't like the purpose or measure of this thread, please create another thread you like. Enjoy~
What's the purpose of this thread? To identify the strongest MD? Or to identify an MD with best H2H between the 6 MDs? You should deeply think over, why there exist other tournament than Super Series Masters' Final...
"The Finals among the Masters" always come at the end of the season. That conveys the idea of this thread. Why do they set up such kind of Final Games? Think about the Professional Baseball cases, too. "Just for fun?" Yes, that's an "extra amusement to determine who's the best of the bests." I prepared this set-up with the same spirit. But the difference is we all know what teams are the bests already. They are in the table.
Limiting the Top 3 in the world, for the last 2 years, LYD/JJS 4:0 MK/HS MK:HS 1:0 FHF/CY FHF/CY 2:2 LYD/JJS ================ So, actually it's hard to say they are all evenly matched. If we go back to much older history, maybe they are. Enjoy~
Let me put it this way then ... In terms of playing ability, KKK/TBH are a notch or two below these 3 pairs. In terms of style n glamour, these 3 pairs are a couple of notches below KKK/TBH.
Why limit to the last 2 yrs?.. ..why not just 1 yr?: this yr or last yr only ..why not the last 3 or 4 or 5 yrs?.. ..why not between 2007-2008?..or 2006-2007?..
Our dear friend has his own logic as I have mentioned so many times before One reason was that before 2008, Jung/Lee wasn't as strong as they were in 2008 & 2009 for the reason that it took time for them to gel together. That was why the time frame that our dear friend has specifically chosen happen to be the year they start to get together
Let me repeat this: who care how many times they lose to a particular pair, if at the end, they could win the World Championships and Beijing Olympics Gold; a feat that Jung/Lee could not achieve unfortunately up to this moment in time. Remember: Kido/Hendra had an atrocious record against Koo/Tan, going into the Beijing Games (0-5 officially). And they were drawn against their bogey pair in the QF. We know what happen at the end Enjoy too ~
Once again dear friend, please check your record book Kido/Hendra won the following tourneys in 2007 & 2008 when Jung/Lee were also participating: World Championships 2007 (Jung/Lee lost to the eventual champion in Final) China SS 2007 (Jung/Lee lost to Guo/Xie in QF) Hong Kong SS 2007 (Jung/Lee lost to Logosz/Mateusiak in R32) Malaysia SS 2008 (Jung/Lee lost to Mollyhus/Kristiansen in R16) Beijing Olympics 2008 (Jung/Lee lost to Paaske/Rasmussen in R32) Jung/Lee won the following tourneys when Kido/Hendra were also participating: Korea SS 2007 (Kido/Hendra lost to the eventual champion in QF) Swiss SS 2008 (ditto) All England SS 2008 (Kido/Hendra lost to Ohtsuka/Masuda in R32) Hong Kong SS 2008 (Kido/Hendra lost to Koo/Tan in QF -- Kido's injury flared up) Malaysia SS 2009 (Kido/Hendra lost to AG/Alvent in SF) Indonesia SS 2009 (Kido/Hendra lost to the eventual champion in SF)
Let's see The thread title is: The Strongest MD Team Currently Since when currently means all the way back to the beginning of 2008??? Maybe in Korea everything is dated back to 2 years, but not in the real world, my boy. In fact, narnia have at multiple time acknowledge that 2009/1 year span is an accurate indicator as stated: Yet, he dances around and avoid using it at all cost. Why is that? So let's use 2009 shall we? Overall H-2-H among the top 3 in 2009: FHF/CY 2:1 LYD/JJS: 2-2 MK:HS 0:1 Expand it to H-2-H using narnia current table will yield these records: FHF/CY: 6-2 (75%) LYD/JJS: 7-3 (70%) MK/HS: 2-2 (50%) Compared that to their overall record in 2009 as well, it's pretty clear who has the best performance currently. That team is not LYD/JJS, hence why narnia been avoiding to use only 2009 stats.
Ok, now it has transfered from LYD/JJS NO 1 thread to here. The no of titles stats, up to France 2009, not considering Team events : 1) MK/Hendra : 2 SS titles, 1 GP Gold = 3/8 titles = 37.5%, SS only = 2/7 = 28.6% 2) Fu/Cai : 1 SS, 1 WC = 2/5 = 40%, SS only = 1/4 = 25% 3) LYD/JJS : 2 SS = 2/5 = 40%, SS only = 2/4 = 50% 4) KKK/TBH = 2 SS, 2 GP Gold = 4/11 = 36.4%, SS only = 2/8 = 25% 5) Boe/Morgenson = 1 SS = 1/8 = 12.5%, SS only = 1/7 = 14.3 % 6) Guo/Xu Chen = 1 SS, 1 GP = 2/10 = 20%, SS only = 1/8= 12.5% 7) Clark/Robertson = 1 SS, = 1/6 = 16.67% I only considered pairs that have won SS titles, among the current top 5 ranked pairs, only Boe/Morgenson's % is less than 20.