silentheart
Regular Member
Per our dear fearless leader Kwun's request. I thank him for the great idea and I was able to contribute. I am posting some observations about the new AT900's engraving.
Picture 1 Racquets to be used for comparison From left to right.
a)AT900-t, b)AT900-p, c)AT900-p (older by few number), d)NS9000-x, e)Cab21
Picture 2 Same racquets in same orders from lower to top.
Picture 3 Same racquets in same order as picture 2 showing all ser# and date/dist code. Pleae note 1) the AT900's font spacings are much smaller vs NS900-x and Cab21. 2) The location of the AT900 ser# is closer to the cone than NS900-x and Cab21. 3) You have to take my word for it, the font size for AT900 is about 0.1mm~0.2mm smaller than NS9000-xand Cab21. I measured it with my wife's tape ruler from her hospital. (I believe it is due to new engraving machine)
Picture 4 AT900s close up picture of ser# and date/dist code
Picture 5 Same picture as of picture 4 with ref line drawn down the middle of the shaft. Interesting observation, the ser# for the a)AT900-t and b)AT900-p is off the alignment even it is just a few number off the c) AT900-p
Picture 6 NS9000-x and Cab21 close up picture of ser# and date/dist code
Picture 7 Same picture as of picture 6 with ref line. They are aligned
Please comment if I made any mistake (except my broken English, it is too late in the night)
Good night!!!
Picture 1 Racquets to be used for comparison From left to right.
a)AT900-t, b)AT900-p, c)AT900-p (older by few number), d)NS9000-x, e)Cab21
Picture 2 Same racquets in same orders from lower to top.
Picture 3 Same racquets in same order as picture 2 showing all ser# and date/dist code. Pleae note 1) the AT900's font spacings are much smaller vs NS900-x and Cab21. 2) The location of the AT900 ser# is closer to the cone than NS900-x and Cab21. 3) You have to take my word for it, the font size for AT900 is about 0.1mm~0.2mm smaller than NS9000-xand Cab21. I measured it with my wife's tape ruler from her hospital. (I believe it is due to new engraving machine)
Picture 4 AT900s close up picture of ser# and date/dist code
Picture 5 Same picture as of picture 4 with ref line drawn down the middle of the shaft. Interesting observation, the ser# for the a)AT900-t and b)AT900-p is off the alignment even it is just a few number off the c) AT900-p
Picture 6 NS9000-x and Cab21 close up picture of ser# and date/dist code
Picture 7 Same picture as of picture 6 with ref line. They are aligned
Please comment if I made any mistake (except my broken English, it is too late in the night)
Good night!!!
Attachments
Last edited: