astrox 88 http://www.yonex.com/company/news/b...-uniquely-designed-to-improve-doubles-player/ astrox 66 http://www.yonex.com/company/news/badminton/astrox-66-easy-return-and-lob-shots/
So AX 77 actually sits in between the S and D, which actually making it even more interesting. I'm looking for one with both its HH and stiffness level sits in between arcsaber 11 and ZF2, anyone think AX77 a good choice?
Thanks for your advice. The arcsaber11 just keeps giving me some "soft" feeling, although on paper it should be a stiff racket. And not to mention the lack of smashing power. ZF2 is definitely powerful, but it's too HH for me after long playing time. One that sits in between would be great!
Have you ever tried the VT80? Or the 80ETN? LDF sounds like a good fit in between too. Sent from my LG-H930 using Tapatalk
You mean VT80 is less HH than the ZF2? Some told me VT80 is even harder to swing than the ZF2. LDF is not bad, I did try it before. Also wondering if i string acrsaber11 with hard string such as BG80, will it give me a "harder" feel. I usually string BG66UM at 26 lbs
You could try the VT80ETN without any of the parts. Rip them all off and replace with regular grommets. As I understand it from a good friend. It's actually rather pleasant to use in that fashion. Sent from my LG-H930 using Tapatalk
You sure Nanospeed 9900 is faster than Jetspeed 10 , any reliable internet webpage to verify. Anyway this racket is no longer used by International players.
How HH the AX77 is when comparing to LDF, D10, VT80? AX77 was rated medium flex, but from few reviews i read, it seems many found it behaved more towards stiff for anything other than back court smashing.