Better i continue with calibar 900b for now and arcsaber 11 . Will wait until someone gets this racket to test and then decide Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Lol what do i tell you, its not as headlight as NF700 Mine is 293-296 with string + grip + overgrip So when you hope its light and easy to maneuver its a miss Youve got an arcsaber 11, if you want lighter and fast racket,then 9000C is not for you Also if you're searching for who have own it and test + review it other than me, theres a lotttt of 9000C review on the previous page
Its always better to try it yourself, unfortunetly not all have the luxury to have a test. If you look for other review, there is no compelete information on it. Some with more muscle power will say its light for them, yet some others that is less muscle but quite agile might say its heavy.
Of course, it's not a head-light racket like Nanoflare 700. I said: I can swing it like Nanoflare 700 (maybe because I've played Nanoray Z speed for long time). Words mean nothing, you should try if you can because there is no "a perfect racket", it depends on your arm/your body as well. To me, 9000C can make me turn to "A Queen In Chess".
Original grip is replaced in their measures, so that could make a difference. Also, I think it's surprising results. For example, Astrox 77 shows as stiffer that 88D...
TC70 has a faster frame. 88s is stiffer (I think) If you compare swing weight (from racquetforce) TC70 (87) sits right in the middle between 4U 88s (85) and 3U 88s (89).
Certainly not looking for light racket, need little more power but not a BP of 300. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well sorry for misinterpretation then If you go to racquet force instagram Arc 11 BP sits at 295mm, swing weight 88.5kg A9000C BP is 298mm, swing weight also 88.5kg Arc 11 91.2gr weight , A9000C 90.9gr weight So you should find a racket that sits between Arc11 and A9000C i think
The problem with reading weight comparisons about 9000C is not consistent across sellers . If 9000C is at 90.9 or 91gr , i should be good . But there are others who BP as 302mm which makes it confusing . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just simple answer, 9000 if you like more head heavy with medium shaft, 9000C is medium stiff and better for fast double player.
7000B better swing speed and easy to use. Feel a bit lighter an softer shaft Good for front player 9000C better control and better power for allrounder But if you pure attacking player go to 9000D for me this is superb attacking racket better than ax99, 88D, fortius 10P, n9ii in my opini.
Even better than the 88D and N9II. Have you measured the headweight of the 9000D Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk