ramadasr
Regular Member
Not much to be honest !!What's the stiffness difference between the 2?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Not much to be honest !!What's the stiffness difference between the 2?
Read again, defense is best on bs12 and ltd, 100zz is best for me on netplay,control things that needs accuracy, and 100zz is not that hard to defense with, it is easy to swing, and the grip that is veryyy long was a big + for meSurprised 100zz was good for you if your defensive player . May be a different opinion!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Ha ha .. overlooked the post . My bad . 100zz needs lot of taming .Read again, defense is best on bs12 and ltd, 100zz is best for me on netplay,control things that needs accuracy, and 100zz is not that hard to defense with, it is easy to swing, and the grip that is veryyy long was a big + for me![]()
I am selling 4 N90iii if you are interested. I am also located in canadaI've been using the n90iiistype for a couple years and now its discontinued and my rackets got stolen. Trying to get something similar but li ning names and models seem to be all over the place now.
Anyone recommend something thats similar?
Thanks ahead of time
Sounds like this may burn my wallet . Not now please says my mind !! How do you compare this with calibar 900B or TC75 in terms of head heaviness, stiffness and overall weight .First session with 9000C, it's not a "heavy racket", not at all.
The handle was so small, I think it a good handle.
I want medium stiffness and balance point around 294 which sounds like for me . This is tempting now .My 9000C (Standard grip + AC102 Overgrip + BG80)
Weight ard 98-99gr depends on how i grip it, sometimes i cut the grip a bit
BP around 293-296 also depends on how i grip it
Length 674-675
Stiffness wise 9000C is medium, for those who love a stiff stiff racket this might not be for you, unless you are not a nitpicking person than its fine
Sorry, closer to arcsaber 11 in terms of head heavy ? Lining website shows as 298 so bit confused.My 9000C (Standard grip + AC102 Overgrip + BG80)
Weight ard 98-99gr depends on how i grip it, sometimes i cut the grip a bit
BP around 293-296 also depends on how i grip it
Length 674-675
Stiffness wise 9000C is medium, for those who love a stiff stiff racket this might not be for you, unless you are not a nitpicking person than its fine
nothing to be confused.Sorry, closer to arcsaber 11 in terms of head heavy ? Lining website shows as 298 so bit confused.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sounds like this may burn my wallet . Not now please says my mind !! How do you compare this with calibar 900B or TC75 in terms of head heaviness, stiffness and overall weight .
Please also post accurate weights if you have.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
9000c being compared to nanoflare 700. Nanoflare 700 is light weight and not head heavy at all. This is surprising .I can play 9000C as nanoflare 700. (the swing shots)
My 9000C is 89 gram.
Simply: I wish all people in the world don't use 9000C but me. ^-^ haha
surely I will buy more 9000C racket when the cost goes down in the future.View attachment 196122
9000c being compared to nanoflare 700. Nanoflare 700 is light weight and not head heavy at all. This is surprising .
Thanks. I am sold . Will order one !!My nanoflare was 4u, it's light but not feathery. ^-^
I strung my 3 rackets at the same time with Li-ning No1 at 23.5 lbs (~ 10.5 kg)
Trust me, 9000C is not a head heavy racket.
Thanks. I am sold . Will order one !!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just thought of sharing the link for Aeronaut 9000C specs.
Nice uploads about specs for various racquets as well.
Sent from my SM-N975F using Tapatalk
Yes,that surprised me as well.This shows BP as 302mm .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk