Li Ning Rackets Fan Club :)

Surprised 100zz was good for you if your defensive player . May be a different opinion!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Read again, defense is best on bs12 and ltd, 100zz is best for me on netplay,control things that needs accuracy, and 100zz is not that hard to defense with, it is easy to swing, and the grip that is veryyy long was a big + for me :)
 
Last edited:
Read again, defense is best on bs12 and ltd, 100zz is best for me on netplay,control things that needs accuracy, and 100zz is not that hard to defense with, it is easy to swing, and the grip that is veryyy long was a big + for me :)
Ha ha .. overlooked the post . My bad . 100zz needs lot of taming .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I've been using the n90iiistype for a couple years and now its discontinued and my rackets got stolen. Trying to get something similar but li ning names and models seem to be all over the place now.

Anyone recommend something thats similar?

Thanks ahead of time
I am selling 4 N90iii if you are interested. I am also located in canada
 
First session with 9000C, it's not a "heavy racket", not at all.

The handle was so small, I think it a good handle.
Sounds like this may burn my wallet . Not now please says my mind !! How do you compare this with calibar 900B or TC75 in terms of head heaviness, stiffness and overall weight .

Please also post accurate weights if you have.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
My 9000C (Standard grip + AC102 Overgrip + BG80)
Weight ard 98-99gr depends on how i grip it, sometimes i cut the grip a bit
BP around 293-296 also depends on how i grip it
Length 674-675
Stiffness wise 9000C is medium, for those who love a stiff stiff racket this might not be for you, unless you are not a nitpicking person than its fine
 
My 9000C (Standard grip + AC102 Overgrip + BG80)
Weight ard 98-99gr depends on how i grip it, sometimes i cut the grip a bit
BP around 293-296 also depends on how i grip it
Length 674-675
Stiffness wise 9000C is medium, for those who love a stiff stiff racket this might not be for you, unless you are not a nitpicking person than its fine
I want medium stiffness and balance point around 294 which sounds like for me . This is tempting now .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
My 9000C (Standard grip + AC102 Overgrip + BG80)
Weight ard 98-99gr depends on how i grip it, sometimes i cut the grip a bit
BP around 293-296 also depends on how i grip it
Length 674-675
Stiffness wise 9000C is medium, for those who love a stiff stiff racket this might not be for you, unless you are not a nitpicking person than its fine
Sorry, closer to arcsaber 11 in terms of head heavy ? Lining website shows as 298 so bit confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Sorry, closer to arcsaber 11 in terms of head heavy ? Lining website shows as 298 so bit confused.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
nothing to be confused.
All brand do standard measurement for their spec. Default grip, no string. Ofcourse there is production fault tolerance which +2 or -2.

Adding string & grip will alter those balance for sure. So depend on what thickness of string you use & under what tension plus how you grip your racker & which grip you use will change your racket characteristic, but not by much.
 
Sounds like this may burn my wallet . Not now please says my mind !! How do you compare this with calibar 900B or TC75 in terms of head heaviness, stiffness and overall weight .

Please also post accurate weights if you have.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I can play 9000C as nanoflare 700. (the swing shots)

My 9000C is 89 gram.

Simply: I wish all people in the world don't use 9000C but me. ^-^ haha

surely I will buy more 9000C racket when the price goes down in the future.racket 1.jpg
 
Last edited:
I can play 9000C as nanoflare 700. (the swing shots)

My 9000C is 89 gram.

Simply: I wish all people in the world don't use 9000C but me. ^-^ haha

surely I will buy more 9000C racket when the cost goes down in the future.View attachment 196122
9000c being compared to nanoflare 700. Nanoflare 700 is light weight and not head heavy at all. This is surprising .


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
9000c being compared to nanoflare 700. Nanoflare 700 is light weight and not head heavy at all. This is surprising .

My nanoflare was 4u, it's light but not feathery. ^-^

I strung my 3 rackets at the same time with Li-ning No1 at 23.5 lbs (~ 10.5 kg)

Trust me, 9000C is not a head heavy racket.
 
Thanks. I am sold . Will order one !!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

9000C is a slightly HH Balance racket, its not even close to NF700 and has a completely different feel from my experience, NF700 is definitely faster, quicker and lighter (i dont own a NF700, but ive tried it before)
9000c is a bit more HH if you compare it to Arc 11, and it packs more power but ive got to say Arc11 is easier to maneuver
 

Attachments

  • IMG-20200423-WA0002.jpg
    IMG-20200423-WA0002.jpg
    81.7 KB · Views: 59
  • IMG-20200423-WA0003.jpg
    IMG-20200423-WA0003.jpg
    109.3 KB · Views: 59
how is the durability of 5U rackets from the instinct line from li ning? I hear li ning has the most durable rackets, does that translate to 5u's as well?
 
Back
Top