PaitonSport
Regular Member
Victor stringing pattern to me is the best so far. By a little configuration with 25,5 Main - 28 Cross (for 27 lbs) to me will result crispy sound and of course give easier repulsion.
See below, new to uploading pictures so let me know if you are able to see it
[GALLERY=media, 932]64BADB7D-6EC3-4A9B-B462-9DDFCF5C62D3 by dm40 posted Mar 10, 2018 at 4:32 PM[/GALLERY]
Hello together,
in 0:49 - any body know this Stringing Pattern?
I don't understand why the 3. cross row is missed
Thank you all
Yes i would love to see this too.. the question being, my stringer just produced a different pattern than the one Mizuno put in their photos. Is it possible to happen, and is it going to cause damage to the racket?Any specific for Mizuno Product, please?
can you post some pictures of your racket's string job?Yes i would love to see this too.. the question being, my stringer just produced a different pattern than the one Mizuno put in their photos. Is it possible to happen, and is it going to cause damage to the racket?
can you post some pictures of your racket's string job?
Normally, as long as the number of mains & crosses is correct and the stringer knows what he does, there shouldn't be any life threatening issues coming from different patterns.
The resolution of that pic is really low - at least if I watch it over Tapatalk. Any chance to post a better one?This is how it looks like.
So I guess it is possible for 1 racket type to be strung with different pattern. Wonder if there is any benefits in doing so?
View attachment 190434
The resolution of that pic is really low - at least if I watch it over Tapatalk. Any chance to post a better one?
From what I can see, it looks like a complete 72 holes standard pattern. What is the difference to the pictures you've seen?
Every stringer has certain personal preferences in the details. It's perfectly normal that a stringer develops his preferred personal standard pattern and process over time which might deviate from the recommended patterns by the manufacturers. If all the crucial things are done correctly and the used pattern fits on the racket, there won't be any difference in how it plays or regarding frame safety.
okay, now it's getting interesting. On the second picture, the racket clearly has a 76 hole pattern. You can easily see the difference in the angle of the last main strings: A significant angle on you racket whereas almost parallel on the second one. You're sure that both pics show the same racket?Yes I agree with you. It looks like the standard 72 holes pattern.
Here goes the "original" pattern:
View attachment 190437
okay, now it's getting interesting. On the second picture, the racket clearly has a 76 hole pattern. You can easily see the difference in the angle of the last main strings: A significant angle on you racket whereas almost parallel on the second one. You're sure that both pics show the same racket?
Anyway, we definitely need higher resolution pictures of your racket that show some details like the 10/2 o'clock area and the positions of the knots.
9 or 10 kg... do you mind telling me what that is on lbs?They might be different version, since they don't have the same hole pattern (this one is 72 hole, the other is 76)
Looks like the top-most cross is indeed missing (7 holes skipped on each side instead of 6, plus only 21 cross) but the bottom is fine, 8 skipped holes (plus one between 10th and 11th main) is standard procedure for 72 holes.
At moderate tensions (9 or 10 kg) there's probably little to no risk for the frame. Above that I'd ask for a restring. As a stringer, I would restring rather than give this to my client, at any tension.
Oh darn i need to have it restrung then.. mine is 24-25That is 20-22 lbs
Mate, ever heard of a thing called Google?9 or 10 kg... do you mind telling me what that is on lbs?
And while we're at it - the knots do look quite fishy. The top one got almost completely sucked into the grommet and normally, such big knots as seen at the bottom could mean that the stringer did a major no-no and strung the mains side-to-side instead of outwards from the middle. Do ask him about that too. Cause that is a thing the means a high risk for the frame.View attachment 190439
Check this out... looks like he does miss some holes. And yes both pics are the same racket Mizuno Carbosonic 79
Btw I count there are actually 72 grommets on this racket. I wonder how Mizuno can get this to have the 76 hole pattern.