LOL don't get so worked up man.
It's just the truth, he was so nervous and he tried to shout very loud once in the first set and
once in the 3rd set to show some confidence and motivation.
Now, now don't be angry,
well all know the categories of your response and what the intricate details of your little
bisections and anomalies all point to in the end....
Don't try to be so mysterious next time.
Be more up front, just like you would for your friend Misbun.
lol
Pjswift I see youare able to give your accurate assesment (not that you couldnt before) on your match analysis. Many here are just blowing their minds with empty talk. Why do one think that LD is putting off the pedal in the second game to play the 3rd. LD did try to win it but he could nt sustain the pace.
Although LCW lost in the 1st, he played the right tactics. Many say he took the shuttle late and giving high lifts to LD but if you see the entire 1st match LCW was baiting LD to come forward to the net before giving high lifts to the back.
This is to prevent LD from going to position to thunder down those power smashers. That is the only way one can at least lessen the rate of fire from LD.
LD had to run from the full diagonal many times to retrieve the shuttle at the net as well as change his direction coming front and then going back again to hit the shuttles whearas against other opponents he would just leap from base position to smash.
He was unable to do that yesterday. By the time he finish the 1st match, the pace in the 1st match has taken a toll on LD.
LCW kept up with the pace by delaying his shots and moving LD around before going for the kill. Remember. if you smash LD whilst he is in comforatble position he could just return your shot easily. Thus, it is not that he did not want to finish in 2 sets but LCW had kept the tactics in the 1st match and when LCW was leading comfortably, LD knew there was no point in chasing every shuttle and tried to keep the rally short and there was his unforeced errors crept in.
The third was LCW turn to have taken his eye off the ball a little with his unforced errors in the 1st few points in the game. LD capitalise and saw his chance to pull through by keeping up the pressure. LD took a commanding lead and there was no way back for LCW.
LD won because he had a good sense of timing that is he knew when to chase and when to rest before looking for the 2nd wind to pull ahead. Had LCW not give away easy points in the 1st 7 rallys of the 3rd, the game could have been close.
I too would like to see LCW sharpen his attacking game but Its unfair to say his game is not up to mark. LD is an exceptional player bulit for the attacking game . I have look at all LD matches and LD take less time to execute a smash then any other player. LCW is slower by one second. LD could Jump and smash immediately. LCW had to jump look at the shuttle make sure the timing is right before he smashes.
There is nothing LCW could do bout it, it is how the brain, muscles and the nerves wired naturally in both these players.
Chinese fans and LCW fans may be emotional and rout for their LD and LCW, but to a neutral observer (by no means am I neutral) they were treated a fine display Badminton singles of the highest qualitiy. Each player has his own strength and weaknesses and in the end there could only be one winner and by probalility it must be LD.
Given the way both played. Paul Eric Loyer Larsen and Li Yong Bo are right, LD and LCW would still dominate the top 2 spot of the badminton pecking order with CJ trailing at 3rd. The new guys are still long way off to unseat the rest ( namely TH and PG) and are far from ready to challenge LD and LCW unless both retire now.
I may be disappointed with LCW not winning AG but then again did we have any one to cheer for before he came along.
Pjswift I see youare able to give your accurate assesment (not that you couldnt before) on your match analysis. Many here are just blowing their minds with empty talk. Why do one think that LD is putting off the pedal in the second game to play the 3rd. LD did try to win it but he could nt sustain the pace.
Although LCW lost in the 1st, he played the right tactics. Many say he took the shuttle late and giving high lifts to LD but if you see the entire 1st match LCW was baiting LD to come forward to the net before giving high lifts to the back.
This is to prevent LD from going to position to thunder down those power smashers. That is the only way one can at least lessen the rate of fire from LD.
LD had to run from the full diagonal many times to retrieve the shuttle at the net as well as change his direction coming front and then going back again to hit the shuttles whearas against other opponents he would just leap from base position to smash.
He was unable to do that yesterday. By the time he finish the 1st match, the pace in the 1st match has taken a toll on LD.
LCW kept up with the pace by delaying his shots and moving LD around before going for the kill. Remember. if you smash LD whilst he is in comforatble position he could just return your shot easily. Thus, it is not that he did not want to finish in 2 sets but LCW had kept the tactics in the 1st match and when LCW was leading comfortably, LD knew there was no point in chasing every shuttle and tried to keep the rally short and there was his unforeced errors crept in.
The third was LCW turn to have taken his eye off the ball a little with his unforced errors in the 1st few points in the game. LD capitalise and saw his chance to pull through by keeping up the pressure. LD took a commanding lead and there was no way back for LCW.
LD won because he had a good sense of timing that is he knew when to chase and when to rest before looking for the 2nd wind to pull ahead. Had LCW not give away easy points in the 1st 7 rallys of the 3rd, the game could have been close.
I too would like to see LCW sharpen his attacking game but Its unfair to say his game is not up to mark. LD is an exceptional player bulit for the attacking game . I have look at all LD matches and LD take less time to execute a smash then any other player. LCW is slower by one second. LD could Jump and smash immediately. LCW had to jump look at the shuttle make sure the timing is right before he smashes.
There is nothing LCW could do bout it, it is how the brain, muscles and the nerves wired naturally in both these players.
Chinese fans and LCW fans may be emotional and rout for their LD and LCW, but to a neutral observer (by no means am I neutral) they were treated a fine display Badminton singles of the highest qualitiy. Each player has his own strength and weaknesses and in the end there could only be one winner and by probalility it must be LD.
Given the way both played. Paul Eric Loyer Larsen and Li Yong Bo are right, LD and LCW would still dominate the top 2 spot of the badminton pecking order with CJ trailing at 3rd. The new guys are still long way off to unseat the rest ( namely TH and PG) and are far from ready to challenge LD and LCW unless both retire now.
I may be disappointed with LCW not winning AG but then again did we have any one to cheer for before he came along.
rashid is an even nicer person?
wow
this is amusing
Now now my friend I am referring to him as he was in his playing days.
採訪手記:石傳威‧丹偉瑜亮情結何時休?
2010-11-22 16:19
(中 國‧廣州22日訊)李宗偉星期天在天河體育館進行的亞運會男單決賽中,堅持了72分鐘後,最終以1比2敗給了“超級丹”林丹,又一次屈居亞軍。這時,中國 部份媒體也許是興奮過度了,忘我般陶醉在超級丹的偉績中,同時還以“恥辱一敗”、“水貨一哥”、“軟弱”等字眼形容李宗偉。看了這些所謂體育記者的大作, 我會心一笑。
怎麼都是那麼膚淺的文字呀?觀看了這場男單決賽,稍懂羽球的人也知道林丹與李宗偉在這場比賽呈 獻了羽球所有的精髓,讓人看得拍案叫絕,李宗偉輸得一點都不恥辱,“水貨”的形容更是狹隘的仇視對手的心態。賽後,林丹體現了大師的風度,稱讚宗偉打得非 常出色,這是識英雄重英雄,同時肯定是發自他的內心,因為超級丹心裡更明白,這場比賽贏得一點都不輕鬆。
李宗偉在本場比賽已歇盡所能,把他細膩的技術、思想、體能、各種戰術和方法都用盡了,而且在輸 了首局後,他也沒有放棄,這種崇高的體育精神,足以贏得對手的尊重。再說,如果說他心理素質不佳,那早在他輸掉首局時,第二局就該崩盤了,就像2008年 北京奧運會時,但他還是沉住了氣,撐著拿下第二局。李宗偉落敗的主因,除了是他的實力差了林丹一點,另一個主因也是在第二局時消耗了他的一切,因此到了第 三局時明顯有心無力。多次回球質量下降,是因為體力已經透支,這是運動員們都能感同身受的。冠軍畢竟只有一個,但努力的選手都該獲得起碼的尊重,在我們祝 賀林丹成就史無前例的大滿貫第一人時,也該向李宗偉打氣,而非落井下石。
no, i wasn't worked up at all.
i said that was to let you vomit out your poor digestions you have on lcw all these years,
i really don't know why, probably afraid and anxious too
but boy am i right about you.lol