Li Ning - China's New Sponsor

1) What is wrong discussion the pro players new sponsors, in the pro players forum??

2) If you want thread moved I think it makes more sense to PM an administrator, than to post in the thread you by some obscure reason, find irellevent due to the fact that it is about pro players equipment and switch of sponsorship?!?!

3) What is the reason to put your views in all bold??

4) If you have been reading the pro player forum, you SHOULD know that pro players rackets are frequently discussed when discussing pro players..

se for example:
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=1233754&highlight=Yonex#post1233754
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?p=676824&highlight=Armortec#post676824
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47292&highlight=Armortec
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=22917&highlight=Armortec
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=39718&highlight=Armortec
http://www.badmintoncentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43757&highlight=Armortec

just a few examples.. If you want all the threads moved to equipment-forum that discuss what equipment pro-players use from this forum.. I think you have a stiff job..

As you have not objected about similar type of threads when the "big you know who" brand and models where discussed in pro-player context, I can't help to think that maybe you are the one more interested in the "marketing" aspect of these discussions, than the rest of us...

/Twobeer

In the forum, PM or posting messages are all dependent on users' decisions. Esp. in web2.0, all users are involved in the discussion.

If the thread is "general" discussion like "Racquets of Professional Players" then it would make more sense. But this seems to be just for "L" company; why should we have to see the this thread title whenever coming to this category, which looks so "commercial"?

At least, if they focus on discussing about "which player" uses "what" then it would be nicer for this category. But, this thread gets corrupted that now people discuss about the racquet itself; like "hey, i used it, it was good or bad, blah blah..." that's something to be discussed in the Equipment category.

Enjoy~ :)
 
Last edited:
If the player is Chetan Anand, his new sponsor Li-ning probably asked him to remove the YY logo on his arc saber 10.
chetan anand playing with li ning rackets..can someone confirm whether the racket is li ning?:confused::rolleyes::eek:
 

Attachments

  • 89757572.jpg
    89757572.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 616
  • 89757574.jpg
    89757574.jpg
    37.1 KB · Views: 615
this player is unbelibable...

li ning shoes & shorts
yonex racquet
Apacs stoking...

he must be rich... so many sponsor looking for him

The racket looks like it is a Li Ning N90 woods?!? I don't know where you see any Yonex racket?!?!

with the logo, my guess is that the stringers at the tournqment made a misstake and put YY-logo when they strung it, and the additional paint on the strings was to cover up the misstake/error..

/Twobeer
 
just strung my racket with li ning accupower 90 string. anyone tried it before?:)
twobeer? anyone knows what type of string model that the chinese players are using?
 
Yeah thats a good thing :D. Finally no more supersticions about conutry codes! Wooohoo

I don't know how many people realized about this.It's true no country codes basically on Lining rackets,but in fact,there is CP code for the chinese national team.:D

If players and recreational players are using the same quality rackets,there won't be any "exclusive" feeling by the players,which every brand will understand,to make their sponsored players felt that they're exclusive.Plus,according to those who've tried to compare,CP and the normal market version of Lining are different in feeling as well.

So,there is codes,but much more simple,just the CP and the market.:)
 
Back
Top