.... I think its against the spirit of the game...
so is sledging by the aussies
.... I think its against the spirit of the game...
but then china will be regarded as the cheaters that won.
mr huang has been contributing alot to bc
he has posted high quality posts.. he flew from usa to macau becos he wanted to gave us live scores and reports where there's no any un/official website gave it.. he gives us high quality reports about news of tournaments or players...
how about you... ?... hmmm i bet your contribution to bc is none,zero,kosong
i have a proverb.. it suits for you : "TONG KOSONG BERBUNYI NYARING"
I believe this is Indonesian for 'Big Noise, Little Substance'
This is an English proverb.![]()
There is a member called vchingThere was a member named vching
who, quite clearly, was itching
to call China a cheat
and then beat a retreat.
Ah, what else is this but bitching?![]()
There he goes again...
Since vching is repeating himself, I'm gonna repeat some myself:
What exactly is this 'suspicious Chinese behaviour'?
Do you mean 'winning' is 'suspicious behaviour'?
Do you mean a 'tactical approach' is 'suspicious behaviour'?
Do you mean 'psychological strategy' is 'suspicious behaviour'?
Mate, I'd hate for you to be a football or cricket fan.
If you were, then every team would be on your 'extreme suspicion' list.
Competition is not just about skills and fitness...
...it's also about strategy and tactics, including the psychological variety.
If I were Lin Dan playing Taufik... and if I knew that staring at Taufik makes him angry, I'd do it often enough to make him lose his cool (and thereby make errors).
In cricket and rugby, the Australians are well-known (notorious, in fact) for their sledging tactics on the field.
Almost every baseball catcher and cricket wicketkeeper resorts to taunting the opponent.
John McEnroe's tantrums were designed more to upset his opponent's rhythm rather than earn some ruling in his favour.
There was an incident (in the 1980s) when chess champion Anatoly Karpov had his personal pyschologist sit behind him and stare unblinkingly at the Russian defector Viktor Korchnoi.
If the China team boss thinks his country would earn an advantage if one of his players were to lose to another, then that's his call. That shouldn't arouse suspicion... it should be reason for admiration. (I remember seeing Rubens Barrichello giving way to Ferrari team-mate Michael Schumacher very near the finish-line at the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix ... this resulted from a 'team order'.)
If Chen Jin wipes his sweat on the shuttlecock, there are umpteen things his opponent can do. Whining (later) is not the best reply.
It'd be useful and laudable to stop whining whenever China wins.
The losers could do better by planning how to pay back in the same coin.
restricting the number of players representing the same country is unfair to CHINA at the first place.
indonesian players also cheat on serve. I think IBF should investigate this too.
is michael schumacher a cheat because of team orders?
There was a member named vching
who, quite clearly, was itching
to call China a cheat
and then beat a retreat.
Ah, what else is this but bitching?
There is a member called vching
who, quite smartly,has been thinking
of how to get China to come clean
but some BC members got mean
because they are not up to his clear reasoning
Well I listen all the arguments from both side so far. I have my own opinion.
But all you listed above are not in my standard of sportsmanship, I don't care if it was done by who and who. I believe that you would agree in bottom of your heart that you don't mean to condone that unnecessary behavior if you can win without, do you ?
We have to remember this just games which means at the end is all about entertainment. But you guys include all the associations that your support either China, Indonesia or Malaysia has lost the spirit of the sports "it is just entertainment".
can you give us one prove![]()
i'm liking you!They are talking about individual event not team event. If you put it as no different, then is not worth watching for any finals where players come from the same country. The country with the same players in final has achieved his objective, WINNING ! is WINNING means everything ? may be to some but I am very disappointed if it so.
No wonder so many athletes willing to take the risk to win or be shamed. Too many bad example like Marion Jones.
so is sledging by the aussies
MS MO SEMI FINALS 2007 Kenneth lost to Gade...
thats semis...
in the 1990s when Indo dominated badminton, they didn't have walkovers... they won it on equal grounds with other opponents...
i cannot rebut or verify your claims that Indo players cheat because i have never heard of such allegations... but from what i see, they serve properly.
restricting the number of players from a country is not cheating. Its to promote the sport. If China has 13/16 of the playeers in the Olympics, other countries would start to lose interest.
that's the difference between chinese players and other players. after chinese players lose, they go back and train harder instead of complaining,however, other players find a large amount of excuses for their losses.
You never read what LYB said each time after Chn players lost? Bad wind, bad stadium, bad umpire, noisy spectators, we lost because we dont care the result, blahblah.
The players do not say much because LYB does all the talking.