I have been a member for almost a month. From what I saw, looks like there are some peoples who don't like certain player's play style because it is boring. I don't have any proof on this. But, it seems like the members here don't like over stretched rallies (e.g. playing lob after lob).
Players certainly don't need to play beautifully. After all, players play to win. But, I wonder if more beautiful play style can actually increase player's performance or not. What if the player who has "boring" play style dominate the badminton world? Does it mean the quality has gone down?
A lot of members here don't like Greysia's play style because her play style is deemed as "boring". Heck, even some peoples said that she should let other pairs to win or she should just retired. To me, it is as if she doesn't deserve to be on court. I just want to hear about your opinion's about "boring" play style.
Players certainly don't need to play beautifully. After all, players play to win. But, I wonder if more beautiful play style can actually increase player's performance or not. What if the player who has "boring" play style dominate the badminton world? Does it mean the quality has gone down?
A lot of members here don't like Greysia's play style because her play style is deemed as "boring". Heck, even some peoples said that she should let other pairs to win or she should just retired. To me, it is as if she doesn't deserve to be on court. I just want to hear about your opinion's about "boring" play style.