Joyous said:I am falling off my chair reading all these funny comments. Now, we know why BCL lost - too much female distraction.
cooler said:i think you're just another TH fan trying to find a plausible excuse for his lost in 2007 IO. Hey, even Indra was quiet after taufik lost in 07 IO. hehe
Base on your loosey goosey analogy, if i won the super lotto (powerball in the US) and Negreanu, prolly the best poker player in the world, am i a better gambler and number picker than Negreanu?? The olympic game is big only because it is a highly promoted game and the dollar involve, it is still tough badminton whether it's OG, AE, WC, sudiman cup, thomas cup, etc...Actually the Opens are harder to win because in the OG, china can only send 3 in each catergory where as in Opens, china, MAL, denmark, KOR can send unlimited players for qualifying.
Also, TH had a good draw in 04 athen, the only tough player he saw was PG.
So TH beats a handicap korean in the final, whooppeeI find shon as a runner up accomplished more with just 1 eye than TH with 2 eyes.
Not done yet.
I say ur view that TH didnt take this IO seriously is grossly incorrect. He was well rested and prepared. TH fans already say that TH only play best when he has an objective. Well, breaking ardy's old record is a milestone for an INA player and is a valid objective for TH to play seriously. Why? if TH won this IO but failed in 08 OG, TH still has the bragging rights of achieving an record of winning 7 IO titles. By losing 07 IO, TH lost this chance since he is older and slower next year. TH missed 2 BIG opportunities in 2006, (1) to win AE and (2) breaking ardy record. Come 2008, i highly doubt taufik can win the AE, 7th IO title or his 2nd olympic. Therefore, TH would have no special record for badminton history. Only tony G has titles in AE, OG and WC. The possible reason why TH make errors in the end was likely because of the home crowd. TH is expected to win. TH did not relax nor fold the 3rd set like in japan open. I believe TH took the match with BCL seriously.
I havent counted yet but LD could claim the record of having the most titles won. If LD win 08 OG, he got a royal flush too![]()
cooler said:LD dont have to give up his medals to trade for a Olympic gold, LD can win it in 2008
Personally i rather owns all of LD current titles and no olympic title because if i trade them all for that 1 olympic gold, it only showed that i was lucky, not the dominating best in the class.
zhao jinhua, hartono, and other greats never attained olympic gold medals, are they lower than taufik?
saugusli said:Hi,
LD don't have Olimpic Title and Asean Games Title.
TH has Olimpic Title, WC, Asean Games (2 times). Only All England don't have.
That u know, In China: Taufik Still in the list to be carefull for any china players.
I remember u that u always used Lucky... This people very stupid lahhhh...
hcyong said:Not a good excuse. I have similar distractions, but I do just fine.
taufik-ist said:ya.....
a lucky guy doesn't win Olimpic Title, WC, Asean Games (2 times)![]()
Only people like you calling member here stupid that is full of hatre.saugusli said:I know that This people don't like TH..
taufik-ist said:ya.....
a lucky guy doesn't win Olimpic Title, WC, Asean Games (2 times)![]()
Misty100 said:The debate is going off topic... maybe the moderator should consider closing this thread.
cooler said:Yes, it happened before, several times.
Ji Xinpeng of china and alan budi kusuma.
it seem die hard TH fans have short memory span and have to be constantly reminded of basic statistics and facts.
Regarding Asian game, I know TH get a huge incentive for winning. For china team, it was just a free trip and meals to doha and back...like it was a big dealNOT. You want confirmation? XXF and zhang ning all lost too to Wang chen and a Yip girl. LD beat TH in the team event anyway.
phaarix said:Whenever Taufik and Lin Dan are involved in a thread you know something like that has a pretty good chance of happening... *sigh*. Some people are just dead set on attacking Taufik...
Simp84 said:lol its always the same old story.. Winning lots of tournament vs winning important events theories..
Lets put it this way.. LD's dream is to be the gold medalist in Olympic, PG's dream is to do the same.. LCW's and many many more wants to be Gold medalist too
So it means OG is one of the most important event to win, as it goes into history and it is every badminton players greatest achievement to win OG
Winning the most tournament guy will always be replaced by another greater new comer in the future, ie PG who we all thought was superb for being world #1 for quite some time, are now just a shadow of LD, and do people remember him for being such a legend? Not so much after the emergence of LD
So lets put an end to what is the most important event, as argument doesn't make any differences, if LD wants the title to so bad, he has to prove that he can win OG08. And if that happens then he is truely the greatest badminton player in this era. And yes > TH i will say.
As in badminton that u should know that, attacking can only be achieved because the attacker has an advantage position or better vantage point to launch the attack. The defender succumbs to defending because they have many weak area where the attacker obviously see through.phaarix said:Whenever Taufik and Lin Dan are involved in a thread you know something like that has a pretty good chance of happening... *sigh*. Some people are just dead set on attacking Taufik...
cooler said:I agree an OG medal has more symbolic status but TH fans see the OG medal as owning technical supremacy instead. It comes 1st a year so it's more scarce, not an end all benchmark of technical superiority.
I already gave you guys the analogy of a one time lottery winner versus a
multi year poker winner.
Why TH is the greatest when so so players like Ji Xinpeng and alan budi kusuma are gold medalists too?
funny how TH is compared to federer. Federer plays alot and win alot. TH, well....malbar said:Taufik is starting to up his form. He will have drops in form as his attention will be geared to the olympics but don't be alarmed and started posting threads saying "taufik is no longer a force". He is like hoyer larsen who wins the big events and sacrifices the smaller events with his mind set on what really matters ( the majors - olympics, worlds, asian games & A.E.C ) all greats are like this. Many past 100m olympic sprint champions lost in warm up events only to come good on the big stage, even easing up in the heats to save their A game for the final ( the one that counts!!) Roger federer lost to andy murray only to thrash all of the opposition in the US open. Taufik is like this, he beat lin dan in the worlds ( or should I say trounced him ) again in the asian games. He could lose to lin dan, or any other chinese 5000 times but if he becomes double olympic champion that goes down in history forever. Hoyer larsen won 2 A.E.C championships & olympic gold. Peter gade has won many more events but hoyer is the true champion. ITS QUALITY NOT QUANTITY!!! Taufik is the same in the big events. Thats when the level of who is the best should be judged. When it matters! in those pressure situations and on the big stage. By the way, in those pressure situations lin, bao, chong wei and the rest of them don't produce the goods. And don't reply with lin dan as won this and that, ask him, I bet he would give up all his titles for 1 olympic gold.
phaarix said:Yep I agree with that first paragraph. But Taufik didn't only win the Olympics did he? He also won the World Champs and the Asian Games twice. That's where he's different from Alan and Ji Xinpeng. He does have some consistency. And Ji Xinpeng wasn't completely useless anyway. Winning the Olympics didn't make him great but he rose to the occasion and outplayed his opposition. But he didn't achieve much else unlike Taufik.
But like I said before, I don't like Taufik for his achievements. I love to watch him play. He's great to watch, and I've noticed Lin Dan also is becoming more enjoyable. He's becoming more dynamic and really using his mind. Why do people have to make out that one totally eclipses the other? They're both great players and they've both proven themselves on numerous occasions!
But I don't see why you think it's necessary to attack others on a community message board. And you attack them because you think their views are weak? No I don't have a huge problem with you. As you for the most part know your bounds. But other people on this board have gone too far in the past. Anyway there are a fair few of your own points that don't really convince me. Especially trying to make out that Taufik's Olympic draw was "weak". I just think maybe you should lay off "Taufik fans" for a bit
.