what is the hardest-smashing badass racket u have used?

Discussion in 'Racket Recommendation / Comparison' started by DRaGoNoVA, Mar 20, 2006.

  1. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    Isn't that just a period of adjustment? also, is the w11 heavier? or doe sit feel heavier because of the extra length?
    and is the ability to transfer energy up to a racket, or the player? (Does a racket influence it? or is it more an adjustment-thing?)
     
  2. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Adjusting to the racket of course will be a factor. However, everything else being equal, the 11 just produces more force and hits harder.

    Again, everything else being equal, ultimately it's the player that transfers the energy. This is why some smash harder than others no matter what racket they use. Some can transfer the energy more effectively then others. How they transfer the energy is another story. :D
     
  3. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    you mean technique right?
     
  4. DinkAlot

    DinkAlot dcbadminton
    Brand Representative

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2005
    Messages:
    12,682
    Likes Received:
    290
    Occupation:
    Social Distancing Specialist
    Location:
    Southern California
    Not just technique. Some people are just stronger than others. :p
     
  5. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    really? That's not fair....

    "everybody is equal" so much for communism;)


    **disclaimer: no i don't have any problems with communism..each to their own.
     
  6. Pete LSD

    Pete LSD Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    6,297
    Likes Received:
    13
    Occupation:
    Soul Searching
    Location:
    Canada
    Isn't Power = Energy Per Unit Time?

     
  7. Rob_L

    Rob_L Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2005
    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Leeds, England
    I've found that some of my old heavy crappy rackets are great for smashing (not much good for anything else) but if you want something that can handle delicate shots aswell you can't go wrong with a MP100 or a AT800 offensive. Choice of string and tension are also important aswell ofcourse.
     
  8. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    I think momentum = mass x velocity,
    but power/force = mass x acceleration.
     
  9. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    that why its between "..." power as in "smashpower"

    sorry
     
  10. budak

    budak New Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2006
    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    isn't this off topic?? anyway, F=ma is definately correct/canon but Momentum=mass x velocity??? cool... i've learnt a new equation at bc
     
  11. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    well power as in "smashign hard" couldn't possibly be mass x accelartion. bacuse that would mean if you could somehow swing yiur racket at a constant speed accelaration would be 0. and so force= mass x 0 = 0
     
  12. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Yes, you are right. There is nothing wrong with the equation though.

    F = m.a

    When I think of it, I realize that it is not force which will be produced, but it is more likely the force which is needed to make something with mass "m" to accelerate at "a" amount. CMIIW.

    Btw, about momentum, I still think that it is mass x velocity. For budak, if you think it is wrong, please share the right information :)
     
  13. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    both formulas are correct. but "force" as in F=ma does NOT correspond with smashing power. MassxMomentum comes closer..
     
  14. CoolDoo6

    CoolDoo6 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    London, UK
    Now that we have the momentum sorted out, I am happy to say my badass racket is a modded Ti-10 with increased weight that swung faster. It smashes hard enuf for the top players in my club to keep coming over to check my racket out. I am using ultra low tension at the moment and I don't have a single doubt that I will have the hardest smash in my club if I were to train myself to have the physical strength and endurance to handle a 30LB tension racket.
     
  15. blinan8088

    blinan8088 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    IT Programmer
    Location:
    Yogyakarta, Indonesia
    Hi CoolDoo6, how do you modify your Ti-10? It sounds interesting :)
     
  16. CoolDoo6

    CoolDoo6 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    London, UK
    I am not going to give you the specifics as I now consider these bordering on trader secrets :) But it doesn't take much imagination to work out where best to increase weight and yet increase racket speed at the same time. The 2 goals seem contridictory, but they are not if you are careful.

    I think both force and momemtum come into play in badminton power. Momentum is important at the point of shuttle/racket contact. While a contact is maintained for however brief a period, the acceleration of the momemtum (ie force) is what boosts the shuttle power futher.
     
  17. jerby

    jerby Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,124
    Likes Received:
    38
    Location:
    EU
    you stuck 5g of weight on your buttend. right?

    what's your new BP? why Buy a (head-heavy) ti-10 only to make it headlight again? why not buy a yonex Blacken?
     
  18. Chire

    Chire Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2005
    Messages:
    182
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Finland
    Hm AT800 Offensive 3U definitely for me. Beats even AT700 3U as well as MP100 3U. You really need to hit the sweetspot though in order to produce powerful smashes with this racket. Timing needs to be exact - I'm having troubles hitting jump smashes after changing to this racket.
     
  19. Matt

    Matt Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    IT Developer
    Location:
    Richmond, BC
    I can produce powerful smashes the best on my 900 SA. Since it is 81g, the the swing speeds needs to be quick to get into the power band.

    The 900 SS, doesn't need to be swinged as fast and I can powerful smashes on that as well.
     
  20. CoolDoo6

    CoolDoo6 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    London, UK
    I don't know why, but Ti-10 does it for me. When something works for me I get the urge to optimise it further to make it work even better. So far Ti-10's are responding very well to my modding. The rackets started off with excellent power, superb accuracy, and adequte defense. My best permanent modded racket has superb power, superb accuracy and superb defense. That racket is used for both singles and doubles, and has a BP of 287mm - just above the point where the racket would swing too fast and give me tennis elbow.

    I am sure many people will disagree. I believe to obtain maximum power, rackets should be as heavy as possible, but should not be heavy enough to noticebly reduce the swing speed, the defensive speed, or your endurance.
     
    #100 CoolDoo6, May 5, 2006
    Last edited: May 5, 2006

Share This Page